At UN, Outsourced Report and Reporter Dodge Congo Rapes, Unanswered Questions

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, October 20 -- The UN might not actually protect civilians, but it has been counted on to issue reports, often statistical, about demographics, discrimination and forms of development.

But the UN Population Fund's “State of the World Population 2010,” despite its title, is a sort of extended pro-UN magazine article written by former New York Times UN correspondent Barbara Crossette.

When Ms. Crossette introduced the publication to the UN press corps on October 20, it was first in a faux Q & A format with a UNFPA staffer.

When this staffer cum questioner opened the floor for questions, Ms. Crossette answered the first question about UN peacekeepers by saying “the UN is unfairly blamed.”

Inner City Press then asked, since her report contained photos and quotes from Secretary Bank Ban Ki-moon's Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict Margot Wallstrom, whether Ms. Crossette thought Wallstrom was unfairly blamed for not having heard of the mass rapes in the Congo until three weeks after they occurred. (Even then, Ms. Wallstrom did not go to the Congo for several more weeks.)

Ms. Crossette pointed out that Ms. Wallstrom “prefers to be called MargoT” (with a T) and talked about Wallstrom's more recent statements. But what about the breakdown in communications between the MONUSCO peacekeeping mission (and wider UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and Ms. Wallstrom's office, which has been in operation for months?

When Inner City Press followed up by asking about the UN's role in negotiations with disproportionately few women in both the Kivus in the Congo and in Doha about Darfur, Ms. Crossette said it is the governments which choose who goes to the peace talks. But the UN flies them - and pays. As does UNFPA.

The UNFPA editor of Ms. Crossette's report, Richard Kollodge, then said that it would be better to ask DPKO about this. Ms. Crossette went on to say “I don't speak for UNFPA, I speak as a journalist.”

After the press conference, several correspondents questioned just this. If a person is paid by the UN to write a pro-UN report, is it an act of journalism? How much was Ms. Crossette paid, and how was she selected? Would a report more critical of the UN have been published by UNFPA?

What, one correspondent asked, about Ms. Crossette functioning as The Nation magazine's UN correspondent while being paid by the UN to write pro-UN reports? Certainly The Nation is free to be pro-multilateralism and pro-UN. But why not then called UN spokesman Martin Nesirky The Nation's UN Correspondent?

(Inner City Press has learned from a number of Ms. Crossette's dispatches in her former positions. But the questions about UNFPA's pay and selection process and implications should be answered.)

A request after the press conference for the type of information one expects to be in a report like “State of the World Population 2010” resulted in an offer to produce a “statistics expert” later. Why does an anecdotal (faux) journalistic report have such a title? Questions, questions. Watch this site.

Footnote: As we reported on October 18, MONUSCO chief Roger Meece, speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations that day, refused from the podium to say when he had informed Ms. Wallstrom about the rapes, which e-mails indicate MONUSCO became aware of from July 30 onward. Afterward, his special assistant Reuben Culpin urged Inner City Press not to wait to ask Meece on his way out, but rather to send the questions by e-mail.

Inner City Press did, to both Messrs. Culpin and Meece. But Culpin's email said “out of the office,” and in the two days since, no answer has been provided. So much for “ask DPKO.” Inner City Press even asked Farhan Haq of Nesirky's office, without yet getting a response. But the inquiry will continue.

As Sri Lanka Cracked Down on Press, UN Said Nothing, Now Congratulates Itself

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
www.innercitypress.com/unesco1srilanka050109.html

UNITED NATIONS, May 1 -- While the plights in Sri Lanka of civilians and non-governmental organization seeking to serve them were confined Thursday night to a informal closed door meeting in the UN basement, Friday the lack of free press access in the country was a matter of heated debate in the river-view Delegates' Dining Room. UNESCO, which has otherwise said little about Sri Lanka's crackdown on the press, gave an award to slain newspaper editor Lasantha Wickrematunge. His widow delivered a blistering critique of Mahinda Rajapaksa's barring of reporters from Northern Sri Lanka, and the killing of 16 media professionals since November 2005.

Surreally, two UN officials then praised themselves for the UN's offer of training to journalists in such countries as Iraq. Staffan de Mistura, the UN's envoy in Baghdad, condemned the reporter who threw his shoes at George W. Bush. Inner City Press asked him and his follow UN panelist Frank La Rue, Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression to explain what UN Country Teams are supposed to be doing, given Sri Lanka Resident Coordinator Neil Buhne's silence while staff were arrested and detained, journalists barred and killed.

Moderator Barbara Crossette, formerly of the New York Times and now a consultant to UNA-USA, said, "let's make the questions go beyond Sri Lanka" into "what the UN does proactively." Mr. de Mistura said, "without going into Sri Lanka in particular," that the UN in Iraq had "complicity" with the local media in a "campaign of constructive embarrassment" in furtherance of fast elections. This of source was a foreign policy goal of the United States, in a way that criticism of Sri Lanka's crackdown on the press and UN staff does not appear to be.

Frank La Rue, despite being the UN system's expert on press freedom, said "I'm not going to comment on what County Offices have not done, I'm not involved in that work." Who is, then?

Inner City Press, after asking its questions, had urged that time be made for a response from the Sri Lankan government's representative at the event, First Secretary Muditha Halliyadde. Mrs. Halliyadde has been present at each press stakeout in the basement, as her Ambassador Palihakkara has spoken. Friday she joked with Inner City Press, your writing is good if one sided, you make us work until two or three in the morning. Her response, however, was no laughing matter.

Mrs. Halliyadde said that no one is being detained in the IDP camps, it's just that they can't return were terrorists are. But the conflict zone is now less than ten square kilometers. She said that press has access to the conflict zone, and cited a broadcast by Al Jazeera. Inner City Press saw that report, in which Al Jazeera English correspondent David Chater was given access by the Sri Lankan Navy to cruise along the shore of the conflict zone. Seemingly in exchange for the access, the interviews he conducted said very little about the government's shelling or detention practices.

Mrs. Halliyadde said that "Ambassador Nambiar and Sir John Holmes" have visited Sri Lanka and everything is essentially going well. Mr. La Rue countered that he had been barred from the country. But why hadn't he said this before?

The event ended with another question being directed to the representative of Sri Lanka, but the UNESCO moderator essentially ignoring it. The World Press Freedom Day event was over, the baby frisse salad, Moroccan chicken with tomato confit and cheese cake with apricot puree had been eaten, and the UN went on to congratulate itself further. Write nicely about me, Mrs. Halliyadde asked. About her, perhaps. But detentions and shelling by the government, and silence by the UN, is hard to praise. Watch this site.

On March 18, Inner City Press on Wednesday asked Nicholas Burnett, Assistant Director-General for Education at UNESCO, why his agency, while condemn crackdowns on the press in the Philippines and elsewhere has said nothing about the newspaper editors locked up during the current conflict, and journalists previously killed. Mr. Burnett said, I can get you an answer. Video here, from Minute 18:36. Three hours later his spokesperson asked Inner City Press to email the questions, which was done:

As I asked at the briefing earlier today, what has UNESCO had to say about the recent imprisonment of two journalists in Sri Lanka, on which RSF is requesting UN action

This is a specific request, also, for comment on 1) the killing of a journalist described at http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=30312

and 2) on the comments which the Sri Lankan President’s brother, Defense Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa made about Vithyatharan in an interview for ... Australia's Special Broadcasting Service (SBS). “He is involved in the recent air attack and I am telling you if you try to give cover-up for that person you have blood in your hands,” Rajapaksa said. “And if someone says he is arrested because he is in media, that person also has blood on his hands.”

Forty two days later, UNESCO has not answered the questions.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/unesco1srilanka050109.html