Thursday, April 23, 2009

At UN, Unlicensed Doctors Give and Take Valium, UN's Darfur General Agwai's Wife Moonlights for NGO

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/un1medical042309.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 24 -- In midtown Manhattan a group of largely unlicensed doctors and nurses are dispensing and in some cases taking and self-medicating with Valium, Diazepam, Demerol, Ambien and other controlled narcotics.

While anywhere else in the U.S. this would be a straight forward felony case, since it is taking place within the United Nations' compound on 42nd Street east of First Avenue, technically international territory, American authorities have yet to take action. The UN's Ethics Office, Ombudsman and Office of Internal Oversight Services have been informed, and even provided with photographs, but have done nothing.

Sources inside the UN have painted for Inner City Press a detailed picture of the operations of the UN Medical Service, housed on the 5th floor of UN headquarters, just above the Press floor. Deputy Director Serguei Oleinikov, these sources say, is both unlicensed and outside of the law. He recently signed off on the “disposal” of dozens of Valium tablets which had yet to reach the expiration date. Click here for a photo of a sample sign-out sheet, and see below.

Tellingly, one of the unlicensed nurses is the wife of the Force Commander of the UN - African Union Hybrid Force in Darfur, Martin Luther Agwai, a Nigerian general. Ruth Martin Agwai, sources says, spends much of her time moonlighting for a non-governmental organization, the Nigerian Army Officers Wives Association (NAOWA). Click here for Mrs. Agwai's letter about NAOWA. Sources say she has used the diplomatic pouch and privileges of the Nigerian Mission to the UN in order to spirit out of the country Accutech medical equipment.

These irregularities were brought to Inner City Press' attention after its reporting on the death of UN staff member Jesmel Navoa last month. Mr. Navoa had a stroke while working at 6:45 p.m. in the UN's publishing shop in the third sub-basement. New York's emergency services 911 was not called in a timely manner, and it took an hour for a New York City ambulance to arrive. There was no doctor on duty in the UN medical service, and none of the staff present had been trained in appropriate Life Support technique. Click here for Inner City Press' exclusive story.

The director of the Medical Service, Brian Davey, held a staff meeting this week at which he referred to the Inner City Press story, and belatedly sought to train staff in how and when to call 911. Sources link the UN medical service to other deaths in the UN on which we will be reporting again in the future.

Mr. Davey's predecessor Sudershan Narula was Kofi Annan's private doctor, was kept on past retirement age and left when Annan did. Click here for a previous Inner City Press story about Dr. Narula. Mr. Oleinikov's predecessor, a Dr. Salam, was a relative of the previous Secretary-General, Boutros Boutros Ghali, and was alleged to have mis-treated UN staff members in Africa. Currently, talk at the UN is of a tourniquet mis-applied such that a staff member has faced losing a foot to amputation. Such are the dangers of nepotism combined with unlicensed and under-supervised practice.

The nepotism of the UN Medical Service is not limited to hiring, but extends to referral. Recently a relative, Dr. Ma, was belated taken off the UN's referral list. Previously, the husband of Kofi Annan's top aide Elizabeth Lindenmayer was said to be a doctor on the UN's referral list.

The UN Medical Service is not supposed to be anyone's primary care giver. But despite this, controlled substances are given out, sometimes by nurses without a UN "doctor's" orders. Additionally, these UN "doctors" receive and sometimes keep sample medicines and sexual aids from pharmaceutical companies. Recently, as the US Drug Enforcement Agency has been informed of these irregularities, some forms of inventory control have belated been implemented. But well placed sources describe this as a cover-up, not a reform.

The UN medical service is part of the Office of Human Resources Management, headed by Catherine Pollard, which in turn is part of the Department of Management, headed by Angela Kane. Inner City Press has previously covered a pattern in which the UN Pension Fund sent staff members who complained against management for mandatory mental check-ups in the medical service. There is a counter-trend in which staff members with supporters in high places are given Long Term Disability letters, to be paid without working, and these ruling are never put into a date base that can be audited.

These uses of the Medical Service would, of course, be contrary to the Hippocratic Oath. These issues, including the unlicensed practice of medicine and dispensing of controlled narcotics go further, and are crimes.

In some but not all cases, the UN medical staff at issue have kept up licensing in the countries they come from. Even this would not be acceptable anywhere else in New York or the United States. But sources tell Inner City Press that several have not even kept up their overseas licenses, may not even ever have had them. The medical service, they say, is shot through with nepotism, such as the hiring and lack of supervision of the wife of the UN's Darfur General, Martin Luther Agwai. The sources describe other questionable behavior by Agwai, in Darfur, that is beyond the current scope of this medical series.

For now the questions are not only how has the UN and its medical service gotten away with this for so long, but also why the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), headed by Inga-Britt Ahlenius, did nothing when told about this. OIOS investigator Florin Postica was told, in detail, and was even provided with photographs of the controlled narcotics. Yet no action was taken. Likewise, Susan John of the UN Ethics Office, headed by Robert Benson, was told part of this troubling story, and has apparently done nothing. Ms. Ahlenius has systematically refused Press questions and has not held a briefing in many months. Ban Ki-moon's Spokesperson's Office cancelled its Q&A on April 20, and resisted taking any range of questions in the days after that. Responses will be reported after they are received.

Even the UN's Capital Master Plan can be impacted, as unlicensed staff in the UN medical service are rebelling against a planned move to a rented office space on Second Avenue and 42nd Street, over Innovation Luggage and a liquor store. There, the lack of licenses and the dispensing of controlled narcotics could, they fear, subject them to arrest. Attempts are being made to keep them within the UN compound east of First Avenue, beyond the reach of the law. Watch this site.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/un1medical042309.html

When Sri Lanka Ordered Doctors Out of Conflict Zone, UN Said Nothing

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/sc2srilanka042309.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 23 -- A week after he was sent for the UN to Sri Lanka and two days after he returned, Vijay Nambiar has yet to speak to the Press about his mission. Thursday Inner City Press asked UN Deputy Spokesperson Marie Okabe why Nambiar skirted the media stakeout Wednesday outside the Security Council meeting on Sri Lanka, if he stopped in India on his way back to New York and if so who he met with, and if he could be made available at such a stakeout or press conference. "I don't think so," Ms. Okabe said to the last request, attempt to permit no other questions. Video here, from Minute 36:56.

Instead, the UN's Deputy Humanitarian Coordinator Catherine Bragg took questions, with nothing allowed to be asked beyond the artificially limited humanitarian issue. Inner City Press asked Ms. Bragg about reported intimidation of doctors in northern Sri Lanka by the government, including their removal earlier this year from government payrolls if they stayed to treat patients in the conflict zone.

Ms. Bragg said that the UN "only heard this through the NGOs" on April 22. Video here, from Minute 16:17. But even the BBC pick up these reports, back on February 11. Does the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, which operates the ReliefNet web site and oversees a separate IRIN reporting service, not even monitor BBC about the exclusion of doctors from where civilians need them?

Another reason for the UN to check the BBC: they quoted Defense Secretary (and Presidential brother) Gotabhaya Rajapakse saying that it was not sensible to send a mission to the "No Fire" zone as called for by Ban Ki-moon. Rajapakse said "it would not be sensible to let aid agencies into the conflict zone because there was already an army operation in progress to rescue civilians." Now what?

Inner City Press asked Ms. Bragg when the UN had in fact complained to the government about the 13 UN staff who, along with their families, are being detained in the government's internally displaced person's camps. I don't have that timeline, Ms. Bragg said. Her spokesperson has said the complaints began in February, but the Sri Lanka government says the first they heard from the UN was a letter on April 15 from the UN's Country Representative Neil Buhne.

Buhne, who has been described to Inner City Press even by senior Ban Ki-moon advisers as having gotten far too close to the Sri Lankan government, has been approved by the government to head a "technical" mission to the conflict zone. Inner City Press asked Ms. Bragg if anyone other than Mr. Buhne had been considered. Ms. Bragg insisted that the UN had chosen Mr. Buhne. But there are senior UN officials who are embarrassed by him.

Bigger picture, Inner City Press asked Ms. Bragg why her Office and the UN had not noticeably complained when NGOs and journalists were excluded from northern Sri Lanka by the government, in contrast to the noise made about 10 international NGOs expelled from Darfur in Sudan. Ms. Bragg focused on a more recent time, saying that Ban Ki-moon has issued more statements about Sri Lanka this year than any other country. Video here, from Minute 22:54.

But these statements haven't even called for a cease-fire. It is said that Ban will return Friday afternoon from the most recent of his many trips, this time passing through Malta. Watch this site.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/sc2srilanka042309.html

UN's d'Escoto Defends Ahmadinejad's Right to Free Speech, Decries (Ban's?) Theater

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/unpga1durban042309.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 23 -- Mahmood Ahmadinejad has asked the 137-member Non-Aligned Movement to condemn UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon for criticizing him, as President of Iran, for his statements at the Durban Review Conference Monday in Geneva. Thursday it emerged, perhaps not surprisingly, that the President of the UN General Assembly Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann is diplomatically in support of Ahmadinejad. Inner City Press asked d'Escoto Brockmann's spokesperson, Enrique Yeves, for the President of the General Assembly's views on Ban v. Ahmadinejad. Video here, cleaned up statement below:

Subj: Durban Review Conference
From: yeves@un.org
To: Inner City Press
Sent: 4/23/2009 1:18:14 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time

Hi Matthew, below is what I said today at the briefing. Best regards, Enrique

Noon Briefing

The President of the GA, of course, believes that the United Nations must provide a forum where all views of Members States can be expressed, even those views that are considered controversial.

That said, he is disappointed that the controversy has become a distraction from the bigger goal of finding justice and sovereignty for the Palestinian People.

It is unfortunate that the attention has focused on the President of Iran rather than on this difficult process of bringing peace and justice to peoples of the region.

(The recent incident unfolded like a theatrical production and, he does not think this is the best use of the world stage.)

After Yeves read out this statement, Inner City Press followed up, asking who d'Escoto was criticizing for focusing on Ahmadinejad: the press or Ban Ki-moon? It was that Yeves made the parenthetical statement about it being a "theatrical production."

In fact, Monday in UN headquarters it was more like a screening of a home movie. Ban's Spokesperson's Office cancelled the normal Q&A noon briefing, and instead used the briefing room to show a broadcast, at first without sound and throughout without any possibility to ask questions from UN Headquarters, of Ban and Navi Pillay speaking in Geneva, denounced Ahmadinejad. Ban went further and called for "discipline" on NGOs. Since then, several have been thrown out from the Review Conference.

Footnote: D'Escoto's good buddy Evo Morales of Bolivia was at the UN on Wednesday for the new Madre Tierra / Mother Earth Day. One reporter protested that there was already one (or two) UN accepted Earth Days. Another called the nomenclature sexist, and said that Germany in the General Assembly spoke of Father Earth.

Morales, for his part, used his hour-long press conference to answer only four questions. Throughout he was sweating and later, while being interviewed, he got sick and was taken away in a wheelchair. He cancelled his appearance in a church in Harlem, where a long line of people arriving to hear him speak were told at 5:30 that he would not be appearing. He cancelled his trip to the indigenous conference in Alaska that d'Escoto is attending, and headed back to Bolivia. The UN says the country is being taken over by the Mexican drug cartels. But that's only part of the UN....

And see, www.innercitypress.com/unpga1durban042309.html

On Sri Lanka at UN, Mere "Remarks to the Press," UK Says IMF Loan Not Relevant

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/sc1srilanka042209.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 22 -- Despite the UN having warned of a "bloodbath on the beach" in northern Sri Lanka, and despite the UK and France having spoken loudly of what they would push for in the Security Council, Wednesday's informal Council session ended with mere "remarks to the press" by this month's president, Claude Heller of Mexico.

As Heller spoke at a microphone in the UN's basement, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's envoy Vijay Nambiar slipped quickly past the press. He left the UN's humanitarian deputy Catherine Bragg, who did not visit Sri Lanka, to speak for the Secretariat. Inner City Press asked Ms. Bragg to provide an update to the UN's figure for civilians killed between January 20 and March 7, 2683, which only became public because leaked to and published Inner City Press. Ms Bragg answered that

"We don't have any official numbers at all of the casualties. Unlike in other conflict situations where the government would have provided us with casualty numbers and that we would verify with other sources, we have not been provided with those numbers by the government so we cannot verify them. We only have estimates."

But she would not give a new estimate. This creates a situation in which it is in a government's interest to not provide information to the UN, because then the UN will be silent.

The Ambassador of the UK, John Sawers, spoke even before Heller. He was asked why the Council could not even come up with a Presidential Statement, as it did on the North Korean launch. He answered that the unanimity of the Council is important. Inner City Press asked Sawers about the UN's access to the screening points for those leaving the conflict zone, and for the UK's position on Sri Lanka's application to the International Monetary Fund for a $1.9 billion loan that would, many say, replenish the war budget and build detention camps in the north.

Sawers said that the UN does not have sufficient access to the "reception" points. He said that "the question of an IMF loan to Sri Lanka is not directly relevant." Earlier on Wednesday, Human Rights Watch had called the delaying of Sri Lanka's IMF loan application the only positive step taken by the countries who say they are concerned.

US Ambassador Susan Rice stopped at the microphone, but said at the outset that she would not take any questions, that she had somewhere to go. One would have liked to know her and the US's position on Sri Lanka's IMF loan application. The previous day, when Inner City Press asked her if the US is concerned about the ethnic aspect of the violence and detentions, she said, "The priority needs to be the physical protection of innocent civilians." Wednesday she specified that both sides are shooting at civilians as they leave the conflict zone, and that the International Committee of the Red Cross does not have adequate access.

Sri Lanka's Ambassador Palihakkara directly disagreed with this point, saying that both the ICRC and Caritas have full access. Palihakkara was seen talking with Ambassador Rice's colleague Rosemary DiCarlo after the Council session, perhaps on this point.

Inner City Press asked Palihakkara a series of questions, quickly transcribed afterwards:

Inner City Press: The UN has said staff is held in these camps without being able to leave. UN says they've been complaining since February. Why aren't these people released?

Amb. Palihakkara: First of all, UN staff are not held anywhere. These are our nationals, Sri Lankan nationals employed by the UN who have come out of the LTTE hold and now, like any other normal civilians, they are in the IDP centers, and they are not held like in a detention camp, but they need to be screened like others, and I agree that it has taken too long to do that screening. ... I have myself strongly recommended that when the UN takes responsibility they be allowed to leave. They are working on that. It's not a policy issue. It's just taking a little too long. But we are working on that.

Inner City Press: Your country has been barring some journalists from going to the conflict zone or even the country at all. Why?

Amb. Palihakkara: I don't think anyone is banned. People going to the conflict area are taken when the conditions are [garbled]. I believe recently some journalists were taken and I think the Reuters correspondent went to the frontline area some weeks ago. ... I believe CNN correspondent filed a report. But perhaps we should broaden that access area.

Inner City Press: What was your view of Desmond Brown being sent by the UK as an envoy? And would IMF funds be used for IDP camp maintaining?

Amb. Palihakkara: Well, about Mr. Des Brown, I think our government has made our position clear that they were concerned about the procedure, not necessarily anything about the credentials of Mr. Des Brown or anything. So I don't want to add to that government's statement. ... [On the] IMF loan, I have to ask my colleague in Washington. ...

Finally, for this report, Inner City Press asked Claude Heller if the Council had gotten a broad enough range of information. He spoke of "appropriate channels" that he would not discuss. His statement, or "comments to the press" --

As you know, the members of the Security Council, we had an informal meeting this afternoon in order to consider the situation in Sri Lanka. The members of the Security Council, we heard a briefing from Mr. Vijay Nambiar on his recent visit to Sri Lanka including his discussions with the government of Sri Lanka. We expressed, all the members of the Security Council, our gratitude to Mr. Nambiar and our strong support to the Secretary-General for his ongoing efforts on Sri Lanka.

The Security Council members, we expressed our deep concern about the humanitarian situation in the Vanni region and the plight of the civilians trapped within the conflict area and we call on all member states to provide urgent humanitarian assistance. The Security Council members, we strongly condemn the LTTE terrorist organization for the use of civilians as human shields and for not allowing them to leave the area of conflict.

In this regard, the Security Council members, we demand that the LTTE immediately lay down arms, renounce terrorism, allow a UN assisted evacuation of the remaining civilians in the conflict area, and join the political process through dialogue in order to put an end to the conflict. The Security Council members, we urge all parties including the government of Sri Lanka to abide by their obligations under international humanitarian law and to allow international and humanitarian agencies access to those affected by the fighting.

The Security Council members, we welcome the news that the tens of thousands of civilians have escaped from the conflict area in the past few days and urge that further steps be taken to allow the safe evacuation of the remaining civilians to provide to them the necessary protection and assistance. We express also the importance of the UN role in assisting the Sri Lankan government in attending the present humanitarian crisis under the present dramatic circumstances, looking forward to the conclusion of the conflict. And we expect also that the Sri Lanka government will support the UN team that is in the field. That's the main elements of the conversation of the informal consultations that the Security Council members had this afternoon.

This will be updated, watch this site. One development was praised at Wednesday's NGO briefing, the delay at the International Monetary Fund of Sri Lanka's request for a $1.9 billion loan. It was supposed to be approved weeks ago, HRW's Anna Neistat said when asked by a correspondent from Xinhua. Video here from Minute 49:09. In mid-March, when Inner City Press asked the IMF's spokesman if any conditions would be attached, he said it was still being negotiated.

While Neistat said that human rights conditions can't be attached to loans, early in the the week at the UN, Jo-Marie Griesgraber from New Rules for Global Finance responded to Inner City Press' question about Sri Lanka's loan request by noting that under Michel Camdessus, military over-expenditure can be to considered a "non productive expenditure." Video here, from Minute 33:14.

And is the building of detention camps, now being funded by the UN, a legitimate "humanitarian" expenditure? To be continued.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/sc1srilanka042209.html

On Sri Lanka in UN Basement, Rice of US Speaks, Libya Offers Money, and China Support

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/bansri9lanka042209.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 22, updated -- As the UN's envoy to Sri Lanka Vijay Nambiar gave a begrudging basement briefing to the UN Security Council, France flexed up its humanitarian muscles while China offered unequivocal support to the government's military crackdown in the north. Libya offered financial support, while Sri Lanka's requested $1.9 billion IMF loan pends.

New U.S. Permanent Representative Susan Rice, it was said, would speak on camera to the Press after the briefing. The previous day, when Inner City Press asked her about the UN's silence about its staff members detained in government camps, Ambassador Rice said, “UN personnel should have freedom of movement and be treated with respect."

Asked if the US is concerned about the ethnic aspect of the violence and detentions, she said, "The priority needs to be the physical protection of innocent civilians."

At Wednesday's noon briefing, Inner City Press asked UN Deputy Spokesperson Marie Okabe to elaborate on why Nambiar initially resisted the Council's request for a briefing. Okabe emphasized that now, he would be briefing. But why did he say it was too sensitive, that his talks with Sri Lankan officials were confidential? One would expect Nambiar to speak to the Press after the briefing, as his colleague Ibrahim Gambari does. But perhaps OCHA Deputy Catherine Bragg is being brought along so she can run interference.

We will live-blog the proceedings from the basement in this space.

Update of 6:01 p.m. -- there is talk of pulling UN Television out from the basement, as they go on overtime at 6. If so, some say, whatever is said outside the meeting room, even on behalf of the Council, is not “official.” A new low has been reached in this basement meeting.

Update of 6:11 p.m. -- French Ambassador Jean-Maurice Ripert stepped out to brief the press. He recited commitments he said the Sri Lankan government has made. Inner City Press asked, what about freedom of movement in the IDP camps? Amb. Ripert said that is an issue, but it is important to distinguish between the government and the LTTE, who are “terrorists... who have lost the war and should surrender and release the hostages.” Then he went back into the meeting, where Ambassador after Ambassador is setting forth his or her view. Video here.

Update of 7:25 p.m. -- in rapid succession, Ambassadors Sawers of the UK, Rice of the US, Heller of Mexico and Palihakkara of Sri Lanka spoke at the stakeout, along with OCHA's Catherine Bragg. Vijay Nambiar left without speaking to the press. Susan Rice, saying she had to be somewhere, spoke but took no questions. (See the approved on the record quotes, above). The rest will be covered in a round-up about the meeting -- now available here.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/bansri9lanka042209.html

UN's and Ban's Backing-Down to Sri Lanka Questioned by NGOs, IMF Delay Praised

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/ngos1srilanka042209.html


UNITED NATIONS, April 22 -- The lead-up to the "bloodbath on the beach" in Sri Lanka was the barring from the northern part of the country of not only journalists but also non-governmental organizations. Wednesday several prominent NGOs had a briefing at the UN, and they were asked why not only the UN but also they had not said more. Joseph Cornelius Donnelly of CARITAS International replied that fear of losing all access to the country, as with the UN, weighed on the side of keeping quiet.

Nimmi Gowrinathan of Operation USA pointed out that as an American NGO, the Patriot Act and the Material Support of Terrorism Act problematized some of their activities in north and east Sri Lanka. The group's president, she said, went to Colombo to meet with U.S. Ambassador Robert O. Blake, but a decision was made not to speak up in such a way as to "bring in Homeless Security" to see what they were doing. Video here, from Minute 50:21.

Inner City Press asked the groups to assess the UN's performance, in withholding casualty figures and refusing to call for a cease-fire. Anna Neistat from Human Rights Watch said that more journalists should have pushed the UN to give out the figures. She referred to the March 2009 document which Inner City Press obtained and published: at that time, 2683 dead, now risen past 4500.

The UN played scared, said Robert Templer of the International Crisis Group, and ended up with the worst of both worlds: no full access to the camps, and complicity in not speaking up about casualties caused by the government. The UN "should have been more forthright," he said. Video here, from Minute 29:55.

Also taking questions on the panel was James Traub, policy director of the Global Center for the Responsibility to Protect and biographer of -- some say apologist for -- Kofi Annan. After Traub had praised Annan's successor Ban Ki-moon for "very intense telephone" advocacy leading to the government's call for a two day holiday lull, Inner City Press asked him to comment on Ban's refusal to call for a cease-fire, and failure to speak out about the detention of UN staff without freedom of movement in government IDP camps.

"I can give a very satisfactory answer," Traub said, because "I don't know the underlying facts you cited to me." He went on to muse that Ban's failure to call for a cease-fire might have been a question of "nomenclature," that he was willing to call for a pause but not a cease-fire. But why? While appropriately also laying blame at the feet of member states, Traub conceded that the UN "is too institutionally inclined to say yes to retaining access, and no to speaking out publicly." Video here, from Minute 53.

But the problem is not only institutional. Even Kofi Annan, one surmises, would have said more in this case, when the UN's own reports showed 2,683 civilians killed between January 20 and March 7. HRW's Anna Neistat posed a question that remains to be answered: how could Sri Lanka so intimidate the UN, when it has so little leverage? She said she doubts Sri Lanka can even afford to throw out humanitarian groups. Why did the UN back down so cravenly? This remains to be answered.

One development was praised at Wednesday's session, the delay at the International Monetary Fund of Sri Lanka's request for a $1.9 billion loan. It was supposed to be approved weeks ago, HRW's Anna Neistat said when asked by a correspondent from Xinhua. Video here from Minute 49:09. In mid-March, when Inner City Press asked the IMF's spokesman if any conditions would be attached, he said it was still being negotiated.

While Neistat said that human rights conditions can't be attached to loans, early in the the week at the UN, Jo-Marie Griesgraber from New Rules for Global Finance responded to Inner City Press' question about Sri Lanka's loan request by noting that under Michel Camdessus, military over-expenditure can be to considered a "non productive expenditure." Video here, from Minute 33:14.

And is the building of detention camps, now being funded by the UN, a legitimate "humanitarian" expenditure? To be continued.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/ngos1srilanka042209.html

On Sri Lanka at UN, Nambiar Said to Back Down to UK, Bloodbath Briefings

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/bansri8lanka042209.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 22, updated -- With wildly divergent numbers circulating about the numbers of civilians fleeing or dying in northern Sri Lanka, UN envoy Vijay Nambiar is said to have reversed himself overnight and is now expected to brief the Security Council this afternoon, well placed UN sources tell Inner City Press. Even some of Nambiar's colleagues in the heights of the UN expressed surprise to Inner City Press that Nambiar “chose a fight we couldn't win.”

The reference is to push back overnight by the United Kingdom, which after protests in London sent its envoy Des Browne, rejected by Sri Lanka, to the Council in New York. A senior UN official ascribed the UK's belated interest to the protests. Early on, he said, when the UN was speaking internally about helping with an “evacuation,” the UK government wasn't interested, saying that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam would use the movement of civilians to escape and fight another day.

While the UN's various public schedules, including the daily Journal and the updated wide screen televisions in the basement, still do not list any Council briefing this afternoon, a notice went around on Tuesday night that rather than Nambiar, John Holmes' humanitarian deputy Catherine Bragg would do the briefing. Now, high UN officials say, Nambiar is back on. We'll see.

Earlier on Tuesday there will be a press conference by a number of NGOs about the situation in Sri Lanka. Inner City Press will attend and ask questions, and may live-blog the press conference in this space, time permitting.

Update of 10:50 a.m. -- The International Crisis Groups says the conflict will go on even if the LTTE is wiped out. HRW says numbers are hard to verify, but military commanders haven't been told clearly enough they may be held accountable for war crimes. Caritas says it is asking for $2.5 million. Will it be used in detention camps? James Traub, journalist / NGO official, is here but will not speak, at least not on the panel.

Update of 10:57 a.m. -- Operation USA says that the government prohibits NGOs from mentioning or working on sexual violence, and has taken all doctors in the conflict zone off their payroll, so they won't give out numbers. A doctor was shot by a “militant” yesterday.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/bansri8lanka042209.html

On Sri Lanka, UN's Nambiar Resists Briefing the Council on His "Confidential" Trip: Is a USG Subpoena Needed?

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/bansri7lanka042109.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 21 -- Despite having been sent as the UN's envoy to the "bloodbath on the beach" in Sri Lanka, Ban Ki-moon's chief of staff Vijay Nambiar is now reluctant to give the Security Council even a closed door briefing on the crisis, sources told Inner City Press late Tuesday.

One well-placed Council diplomat said that despite all 15 members, including China and Russia, agreeing to an "informal interactive dialogue" with Mr. Nambiar, who has just returned via India from three days in Sri Lanka, they were told that Nambiar views the matter as "too sensitive" even for discussion behind closed doors. Nambiar argued that as a "mediator," what he discussed with Sri Lanka's president Mahinda Rajapaksa and his brothers was "confidential," even from the Security Council.

One Permanent Five member of the Council, in this account, has protested Nambiar's refusal, which will be transmitted to Nambiar and the Secretariat by Council President Claude Heller on Mexico. At press time late Tuesday, the projected Wednesday afternoon briefing of the Council, at least by Nambiar, is in doubt. Nambiar has argued that "it is mostly a humanitarian and not a political situation," as Council source, and China before that, have put it.

Thus, Nambiar argues, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs should give the briefing, not him. But it is Nambiar who with such fanfare flew to Colombo. And OCHA chief John Holmes, who has not been in Sri Lanka for weeks, is now in China. The only other option would be Hitoki Den, below director level in the UN Department of Political Affairs, who accompanied Nambiar on his trip.

Even regarding Myanmar, Under Secretary General Ibrahim Gambari briefs the Council, and then takes questions from the media.

Council and other UN sources expressed amazement that in this Sri Lanka case a UN Under Secretary General would attempt to rebuff a request to brief the Council, on one of his few pieces of public work during Ban Ki-moon's administration. Perhaps the Security Council needs to serve Nambiar a subpoena... Watch this site.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/bansri7lanka042109.html

On Fijian Peacekeepers, Australia Not Answered by Ban, Despite New Iraq Situation

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/ban2fiji042109.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 21 -- Australia and New Zealand have this month asked UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to stop using peacekeepers from Fiji, in light of the further suspension of democracy in that country. Inner City Press has twice asked Ban's spokespeople for their response, only to be told that use of Fijian troops will continue on a "case by case basis."

Tuesday evening at a reception in the UN's lobby, Inner City Press asked Australia's Permanent Representative to the UN Robert Hill if the Secretariat has responded to his country's call. "They haven't given any more response than they gave to you," Ambassador Hill replied, "that they do it on a case by case basis." He went on to say that in Iraq in the past, there "weren't too many options," but that now has probably changed.

"If there are others prepared to serve," Hill said, "with Fiji under the current regime, we think it better they didn't" continue on any UN peacekeeping mission.

Following Monday's closed door briefing of the Security Council about Fiji by the UN's political chief Lynn Pascoe, and Pascoe canceling his formal and promised media availability at the stakeout, Inner City Press called after him in the hall, what the thinking is on continued use of Fijian peacekeepers. Pascoe called it "complicated," noting that there are also Fijians serving in UN Police, and as security in Iraq. We debate it all the time, he said. Perhaps Ambassador Hill's analysis that the new situation in Iraq will allow Ban to finally fulfill what Kofi Annan said will become part of that debate.

A native Fijian human rights professional recently interviewed by Inner City Press said, on condition of anonymity due to crackdowns on groups in Fiji, that most rights advocates in Fiji wish that Ban lived up to what Annan had said, and stopped using Fijian soldiers. "They learned bad habits while serving on those missions," said the source. While Hill diplomatically disagreed, Inner City Press has heard similar analysis of soldiers from Pakistan, India, Morocco and even Sri Lanka, all of which have had "peacekeepers" repatriated from UN missions for sexual abuse. Immunity breeds contempt, appears to be the theme.

Hill spoke at an event celebrating Australian peacekeepers' service from East Timor to the Solomon Islands and elsewhere. A jazz band, complete with female trumpeter, played jazz as quiches and sushi were passed around. Ambassadors mixed with UN Procurement officers -- there is a conference these days for European Union companies to get more contracts -- and a range of UN staff. The vibes was positive, but the Fiji and dictatorship questions unanswered.

Again we note that New Zealand's then-prime minister Helen Clark as reported by Inner City Press in 2007 said, "We've made it very clear to the UN that we do not believe they should be using Fijian troops." Now Ms. Clark is coming in as UN Development Program Administrator, described as the third most powerful position in the UN system. What will she do on this? It will be among her first tests. Watch this site.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/ban2fiji042109.html

As UN Staffer Found With Child Porn, No Answers on Supervisors' Role, UNMIS or Cote d'Ivoire, Gun-slinger Retained in Nairobi

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/un2porno042109.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 21 -- A long-time UN staff member was arrested for child pornography at Canadian customs on April 9. When Inner City Press asked the UN about it on April 21, Deputy Spokesperson Marie Okabe said that the UN's Mr. Jose Antonio "Ortega was on a personal trip and left on Thursday, 9 April, for Canada. He was expected to be back in the office on 13 April but did not show up."

As reported in the Canadian press, "portable memory devices found in his backpack contained more than 800 images of hard-core child pornography, some involving a girl who appeared to be about five years old. Mr. Ortega Osona expects to lose his job as a demographer with the UN's fertility division because of the convictions, defense lawyer Geoff Newton said. 'Any jail sentence he gets pales in comparison to the effects this will have on his life,' Mr. Newton said."

But if the UN's refusal to oust or reassign Alexander Barabanov, a Russian staff member at the UN in Nairobi who insulted local authorities and carried an unlicensed gun, or its reportedly kid-gloves treatment of higher officials involved in a pornography ring are any guide, Mr. Ortega will not necessary "lose his job."

At Tuesday noon briefing, Inner City Press also asked, video here

Inner City Press: In terms of seriousness, there is a report that the Head of Operations of the UN Centre in Nairobi, Alexander Barabanov, who was found by Kenya to have an illegal weapon, is still serving the UN. A series of letters has been sent to Angela Kane and OLA trying to get authority to discontinue his service to the UN, due to the illegal gun. Is he still in service, and if so, why?

Deputy Spokesperson: I don’t have any information on that. I have to look into that for you.

But twelve hours after that statement, no further information has been provided. Some now say that Anna Tibaijuka's demotion at the UN in Nairobi in favor of Achim Steiner may have been related to her persistence in trying to hold Mr. Barabanov accountable. We aim to have more on this.

Earlier in Tuesday's noon briefing, Ms. Okabe claimed that there was no substantive difference in having cancelled the previous days' Q&A session, because we "took your questions in our Office and we responded to your questions like we normally do." That is, responded only partially, and to some questions, not at all.


UN: blue passport, blue movies, carte blanche

Earlier in the afternoon on Tuesday, since Ms. Okabe limited questioning by saying, "only one more question" even though the previous day's briefing had been cancelled and there was no one else waiting for the room, Inner City Press submitted these questions in writing, none of which have been responded to ten hours later:

Subj: Re: your question on sri lanka - follow-up, incl. on Sudan, Nairobi (2), Cote d'Ivoire, pornography (2), thanks
From: Inner City Press
To: Deputy Spokesperson, Associate Spokesperson, Spokesperson for OCHA
Sent: 4/21/2009 2:05:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time

In a message dated 4/21/2009 1:19:19 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, unspokesperson-donotreply [at] un.org writes:
We have raised the issue of staff in IDP camps with the GoSL since at least February. --Stephanie Bunker

Hello. (1) Please comment on / respond to the following public statements by the GoSL:

"The Government has received a letter from the United Nations resident and humanitarian coordinator Neil Buhne requesting movement for UN staff in refugee camps in Vavuniya, Resettlement Minister Rishad Baduideen said yesterday. “We received the letter on Wednesday evening and it was from Neil Buhne,” Minister Baduideen said. .. Minister Baduideen said he had not received a letter from the UN and unless they receive a formal complaint that they cannot look into it, and as and when they do they will discuss it with the military officials. END
So are you saying that the UN's raising of the issue since Feb was informal? To whom was it raised, given the above? And what is the current status?

I have been told that a (South) Sudan paragraph was sent to me, but I have not found it. Please send. And (2) what is the UN's response to

"A report on the March attacks by a joint team of different U.N. agencies... called for UNMIS to increase patrols in the area and to increase support to local officials to try to improve the dire security situation."

(3) What is the UN's response to the Forces Nouvelle in Cote d'Ivoire saying they will withdraw from the peace process if elections are not held in 2009?

According to the UN, when will elections be held?

(4a) The name of the administrative officer in UN - Nairobi I asked about is Alexander Barabanov, director of administrative services.

(4b) on the UN Security officer killed in his home in Kenya, please state whether the UN has any inkling if it had anything to do with his service at/to the UN, or that is had nothing to do with it.

(5a) The child porn guilty plea, on which I am asking for updates on what the UN does, was by "Jose Antonio Ortega Osona, 40, a Spanish citizen who lives in New York, pleaded guilty Friday in Dartmouth provincial court to a Criminal Code charge of possessing child pornography and a Customs Act charge of smuggling prohibited goods."

http://thechronicleherald.ca/Front/9011475.html

(5b) Finally, for now, a simple factual question best answered in this format / medium:

please confirm or deny that there are several senior DSS / SSS officers at UNHQ in NY who have received letters of reprimand for pornography, and explain any difference of treatment from that accorded on the same charges to a lower level staff member. To ensure your answer, I suggest you ask OHRM, OIOS and DSS.

The context of this last still-unanswered question is the UN's show of discipline against a lower level UN purveyor of pornography, while the underlying investigative report made it clear that many more people, at higher levels, were and are implicated. Click here for Inner City Press' exclusive December 18, 2008 report, " Suspended UN Pornographer Opposed Gays, Liked Dogs, As Higher Ups Escape."

Now, sources in the Department of Safety and Security complain more loudly of and name supervisors who have been informed they are under investigation or found to be involved in pornography, but nothing has happened to them. Several were part of the "scam promotions" imbroglio exposed by an intra-DSS memo leaked to and published by Inner City Press, click here for that. Some say a wave of disciplinary actions might soon begin. Watch this site.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/un2porno042109.html

At UN on Sri Lanka, US Call for Pause, UN Bobs and Weaves, Briefing Wednesday

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/bansri6lanka042109.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 21 -- As in the UN Security Council a series of speeches were given Tuesday about the UN's mediation work, Inner City Press asked United States Ambassador Rosemarie DiCarlo for the U.S.'s position on recent military action in Sri Lanka. “We want a pause,” Ambassador DiCarlo said. “We need to see more” on the Sri Lanka government's compliance with their “agreement with Mr. Holmes and Mr. Kaelin.”

John Holmes, the UN's top humanitarian, is currently in China, it was announced at Tuesday noon briefing in New York. Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's Deputy Spokesperson Marie Okabe to explain Ban's statement on April 20 that he “deplores the continued use of heavy weapons in the vicinity of civilians, and the use of force by the LTTE in preventing the departure of civilians from the conflict zone.” Who is Ban saying is using heavy weapons?

Ms. Okabe called Ban's statement “clear and strong,” and chided Inner City Press for having allegedly missed another statement she read out as Inner City Press “set up shop there” in the briefing room. Some note that the UN's “noon” briefing starts 10, 15 or even 20 minutes late. In any event, the statement wasn't missed, just non-responsive.

Inner City Press asked Ms. Okabe to square her Office's statement to Inner City Press on April 13 that the UN had repeated complained to Sri Lanka about the detention of UN staff in the government's IDP camps with Sri Lanka's statement that the first complaint was two days after Inner City Press raised it, on April 15. Ms. Okabe said she wasn't certainly of the timeline, and later produced a one-line answer from Mr. Holmes' spokeswoman Stephanie Bunker, that the UN has complained “since February.” Inner City Press has asked the UN to Please comment on / respond to the following public statements by the GoSL:

"The Government has received a letter from the United Nations resident and humanitarian coordinator Neil Buhne requesting movement for UN staff in refugee camps in Vavuniya, Resettlement Minister Rishad Baduideen said yesterday. “We received the letter on Wednesday evening and it was from Neil Buhne,” Minister Baduideen said. .. Minister Baduideen said he had not received a letter from the UN and unless they receive a formal complaint that they cannot look into it, and as and when they do they will discuss it with the military officials. END

So are you saying that the UN's raising of the issue since Feb was informal? To whom was it raised, given the above? And what is the current status?

The UN's response will be reported on this site after it is received. On the timing of UN envoy Vijay Nambiar's briefing to the Council, Ms. Okabe says he is “at Headquarters,” and Council sources it will be Wednesday afternoon, in the basement.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/bansri6lanka042109.html

On Sri Lanka, UN Council "Waits for Nambiar," UK Says It's Listening, But...

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/bansri5lanka042109.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 21 -- With the Sri Lankan government's ultimatum deadline having expired, the UN Security Council has still not heard from Ban Ki-moon's envoy Vijay Nambiar. Tuesday morning in front of the Council, Inner City Press asked Austrian Ambassador Thomas Mayr-Harting when the briefing would take place. “This week,” he said. “The issue is basically the timing, and the timing of Nambiar himself.”

Moments later, Inner City Press asked this month's Council president Claude Heller of Mexico if there had been any movement on the issue since what he told the Press midday on Monday. “Not yet,” Ambassador Heller said. “We are waiting for Nambiar to come.”

Nambiar left Sri Lanka days ago, after President Mahinda Rajapakse and his two brothers rebuffed a request for any pause in the military assault, and reportedly told Nambiar not to attempt any contact with the LTTE. Council sources say that Nambiar stopped in India on his way back, and that it is not clear that this stop really had anything to do with his Sri Lanka mandate. “Funny time for home leave,” one of them remarked. Another said, once you travel all that way, why not? Except for the timing.

Meanwhile, the UK Mission to the UN wishes to make clear that Gordon Brown's envoy to Sri Lanka Des Browne, whom President Rajapakse rejected, has in fact been trying to bring about an “urgent” briefing at the UN. The UK Mission, from which a comment on the legality of Sri Lanka's detention of UN staff is still awaited, sent Inner City Press this statement from or about Des Browne, “in case the below is of interest” --

Des Browne MP, the UK Prime Minister's Special Envoy for Sri Lanka, visited the United Nations headquarters in New York on 20 April. At the conclusion of his visit, Mr Browne said:

"The UK government, having made clear its deep concern at the deteriorating humanitarian situation in north-eastern Sri Lanka, strongly supports the work that the UN has been doing to try to arrange a UN-assisted civilian evacuation from the conflict zone.

"As the Secretary-General has said, UN staff must now be allowed into the conflict zone to facilitate relief operations and the evacuation of civilians.

"I welcome reports that over the past three days substantial numbers of civilians have escaped from the conflict zone. The UK will continue to work with its international partners to try to secure an immediate ceasefire to facilitate a civilian evacuation. I call on the LTTE to allow civilians to leave.

"I was reassured by my meetings here that the UN and our partners are focused on the need to improve conditions in the IDP camps through better access to medical facilities, transparent registration processes, international monitoring, and freedom of movement in and out of the camps. I urged them to provide UN supervision of the reception arrangements for civilians as soon as they cross the front line.

"All Sri Lankans have an interest in peace and prosperity in their country, and we will do what we can to help them achieve that goal. It is clear from my meetings today with senior UN staff, governments and NGOs that the voices of Tamil communities throughout the world are being heard and understood."

That communication is flowing as Browne's statement says it is is called into a question by a British Tamils press release complaining that the “British Government is yet to break its silence on the latest massacre, the human cost of which is comparable to the total casualty figures of the recent Gaza conflict.” Inner City Press has asked the UK Mission for the chance to interview Des Browne.

Not only is the UN's and Security Council's response to the “bloodbath on the beach” in Sri Lanka strikingly less than to Gaza, Darfur, Georgia or other recently conflicts -- even today April 21, there is at the UN and in the Council much more focus on a bureaucratic meeting on the North Korea sanctions committee than on Sri Lanka. Watch this site.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/bansri5lanka042109.html

On Sri Lanka, France Requests UN Briefing, Nambiar's Slow Return, Ban's Tilt

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/bansri4lanka042009.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 20 -- With the Sri Lankan government speaking of expanded military action on Tuesday in the "No Fire" Zone, the UN Security Council behind closed doors on Monday discussed getting a briefing from Ban Ki-moon's envoy Vijay Nambiar. On camera, United States Deputy Permanent Representative Alejandro Wolff told Inner City Press that the U.S. "supports the call" by the United Kingdom for a briefing on Sri Lanka. Video here, from Minute 9:17.

Sources tell Inner City Press that in the closed-door meeting, it was France which made the request for the briefing. Outside the chamber, Inner City Press asked UK Permanent Representative John Sawers if his country's envoy to Sri Lanka Des Browne, rejected by the government there, is already in New York. Yes, Ambassador Sawers said.

Security Council President Claude Heller of Mexico told Inner City Press that as of mid-day on April 20, Browne had not visited to the Council, but that "the general sense of the members of the Security Council" is to get a briefing from Nambiar. "We know that Sri Lanka is a very special case," he said, but "there is an interest to be briefed."

This reference to Sri Lanka's "special" status highlights the Council's disparate treatment of the "bloodbath on the beach" in Northern Sri Lanka. While less intense fighting, at least now, in the western Sudan region of Darfur gives rise to numerous Council meetings, even large scale military action in areas packed with civilians in Sri Lanka is kept from the Council's formal agenda.

A well-placed Council source tells Inner City Press that in Monday's closed-door consultations, China said that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam "use" any Council briefing to legitimate themselves, and that the Council should beware. This is a argument straight from the Sri Lankan government. It is also one that Sudan for example has advanced without success regarding the emboldening of the Justice and Equality Movement rebels by the Council's attempted micro-managing of events in Darfur. But, as Ambassador Heller said, Sri Lanka is "a special case."

Some point to Ban Ki-moon's prepared statement on Monday, criticizing the LTTE but not saying who is doing the deadly shelling of the No Fire Zone, and say it reflects a lack of balance, even complicity. There was no opportunity to ask Ban or his spokespeople about it on Monday, as the normal noon briefing was cancelled and replaced by a one-way television hook up with Geneva, where Ban denounced an anti-Israel statement made at the Durban Follow-up Conference in Geneva.

The Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary General said that coverage of Ban's position on this was more important or newsworthy that the day's other events, including in Sri Lanka.

Inner City Press asked where Nambiar is, since the Council can't be briefed until he returns. Sources tell Inner City Press he stopped in India on his way back. Ban's office says Nambiar will be back in New York on Tuesday morning, but Council sources think it won't be until Wednesday, and that the briefing will take place them, more than 24 hours after the expiration of the Sri Lankan government's ultimatum. Watch this site.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/bansri4lanka042009.html

UN Pitches Ban vs. Ahmadinejad on One-Way TV Screen, No Questions

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/ban1durban042009.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 20 -- The UN's priorities were shown this Monday morning when a one-way video feed of Secretary General Ban Ki-moon denouncing Iranian president Ahmadinejad's comments on Israel preempted the UN's noon press briefing. Questions would not be taken, then, on the fire over the weekend in the UN compound in Darfur, more than 100 dead in South Sudan after the UN failed to increase patrols, a workers' strike against UNRWA in Jordan, nor the carnage in Sri Lanka.

A UN spokesperson explained that it would not be possible to be prepared on these other issues. Anyway, the spokesperson continued, reporters at the UN had expressed a desire to see the Ban briefing in Geneva, even if they could not ask any questions. This is the story today, the message was: Ban's outrage at Iran, for its comments on Israel.

What explains this seemingly disproportionate reaction? Some guessed it was Ban's attempt to put “deadbeat-gate” behind him, where he said the U.S. is the biggest deadbeat. Others said it was to make up for criticizing the U.S. and others for not attending the Durban review conference in Geneva (those countries were now saying, we told you so). Some journalists joked about throwing shoes or sandals at the one-way TV screen. “It's a new low,” said one wag. We will live-blog the proceedings, such as they are, in this space.

Update of 12:19 p.m. -- US Deputy Permanent Representative Alejandro Wollff came to the stakeout, primed to speak about Durban, and praised Ban's written statement. One of Ban's spokespeople watched from the riser: the sound was low because the UN Secretariat has allowed chaos in its UN TV service.

Update of 12:32 p.m. -- even with no stakeout going on, there are a total of two journalists in the briefing room, watching Ban answer two questions in Geneva, does he understand now why some countries didn't come? Ban's office said that “the reporters in New York” wanted it this way, no noon briefing, just the Ban presser. But this does not appear to be true.

Update of 12:40 p.m. -- In UN briefing room in New York, still only two journalists in the room, plus Inner City Press intermittently. Even the person from the President of the General Assembly's office has left. On screen, Reuters in Geneva is asking, is this a difficult day for the UN? That Ahmadinejad said what he said right after meeting with Ban... Ban calls it totally unacceptable, “destructive.” And some NGOs in the gallery, he says, along with some member states were not behaving in accordance with the rules and regulations. Hopes for disciplinary measures by conference president. What?

Update of 12:47 p.m. -- as Navi Pillay says she went to sleep on Friday telling herself, “job well done,” even the two other journalists have left. Pillay thanks Susan Rice for calling to cancel, digs at European countries which didn't even call. Fiasco on both sides of the Atlantic. In New York, all other news preempted by the UN for an empty room. Bad instincts?

Update of 12:59 p.m. -- speaking of bad instincts, running out of the empty briefing room while Ban speaks on screen, Council president Heller's stakeout is already over, and the UN's Lynn Pascoe has, reporters say, canceled his stakeout about Fiji. Thus, the UN has said nothing today expect Ban (and Pillay) vs. Ahmadinejad. But Inner City Press is told that, seeing the briefing room empty, UN Deputy Spokesperson Marie Okabe came back and read out a statement on camera. No questions, just one-way communication. Oh but one question that Inner City Press asked up in the spokesperson's office is answered, sort of, by e-mail:

Subj: Your question on the UNRWA strike
From: unspokesperson-donotreply un.org
To: Inner City Press
Sent: 4/20/2009 12:20:38 P.M. Eastern Standard Time

UNRWA says it is negotiating possible salary increases with its striking employees. But UNRWA also says its high budget deficit makes it hard to meet all their demands immediately. For any further information, please contact UNRWA.

And that was the question taken at, or in place of, the noon briefing. [Thankfully, Amb. Heller stopped in the hall and gave Inner City Press an answer on Sri Lanka that will be reported shortly.] Click here for a review of last week's performance, two misstatement and a run-around. 10-4, - 30 -

And see, www.innercitypress.com/ban1durban042009.html

UN Misspeaks on Sri Lanka Complaints and Skanska Suit, Kosovo Runaround, Fiji Connections



Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/ossg1apwk041909.html

UNITED NATIONS, April 19 – In last week’s UN answers to questions asked at noon, there were at least two seeming misstatements, and one near-comical runaround. On Sri Lanka, Associate Spokesman Farhan Haq told Inner City Press on both April 13 and April 14 that the UN had “repeated” urged the government to release UN staff members detained in internally displaced people’s camps. But by week’s end, Sri Lankan “Resettlement” Minister Rishad Baduideen replied that the first the government heard from the UN about the issue was on April 15 -- two days after Inner City Press wrote and asked about it, and Mr. Haq’s answer.

On April 17, Inner City Press asked and Haq responded

Inner City Press: Just on this asbestos, first can you either confirm or respond to the seeming fact in the public record that Skanska is a named defendant in an ongoing civil suit about mishandling asbestos in the Monterey Courthouse in California, and that it had paid a fine in connection with that case earlier on? And also that ATC has been issued an order of non-compliance from the Clean Air Act by the EPA, and why they were selected.

Associate Spokesperson Haq: You know, I have something for you on that, but I don’t know whether I have it here. So many papers, but that one is still upstairs. I’ll have to tell about that on afterwards.

[The Associate Spokesperson later said regarding the lawsuit in California concerning Skanska and asbestos abatement: Skanska had made the United Nations aware of this lawsuit before they were selected, in the 2007 Request for Proposal process. Neither Skanska nor Skanska subcontractors performed any asbestos abatement on the referenced project and all charges were dismissed in 2007 and permanently removed from the record by the State of California.]

There is only one problem with this answer: it is false to say that the lawsuit is dismissed, because the civil suit continues, as Skanska and CMP personnel below the level of Michael Adlerstein admit. Adlerstein has misspoken, and the Spokesperson’s office has repeated it, in writing. (Similarly, it is possible that OCHA or the UN Country Team in Sri Lanka are the origin of Haq's statements that the Sri Lankan government has denied.) Now what?

Of the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary General, sources tell Inner City Press that it is filing complaints with DPI chief Kiyosaka Akasaka and others that the Office is under-staffed, particularly with Ban Ki-moon's near constant travel. Despite Sri Lanka directly contradicting with Haq and John Holmes said, it is of course possible that it is the UN telling the truth. But then one expects the UN to publicly take issue with Sri Lanka's denials, just as the UN and OSSG have with Sudan, Zimbabwe and other member states. We'll see.

Also of interest is the line that “Skanska had made the United Nations aware of this lawsuit before they were selected.” Perhaps this was merely voluntary on Skanska’s part. Because regarding former Nigerian president Obansanjo, a UN contractor in a way, \although the UN has refused Inner City Press’ request to know how much he gets paid as envoy to the Great Lakes, Haq on April 15 said he was not aware of charges:

Inner City Press: Actually two things. One is, there is a report out of Nigeria that is unfolding a Halliburton bribery scandal that… Anyway, the report is that former President [Olusegun] Obasanjo received bribes from Halliburton for a liquefied natural gas plant in the country. I am wondering of its something that the UN is aware of and what impact it might have on Mr. Obasanjo’s service as an envoy in the Great Lakes region.

Associate Spokesperson Haq: We’re not aware of that report.

And apparently the UN has done nothing since to make itself aware, despite a request in the Halliburton scandal being made to the UN state parties to the anti-corruption agreement.

The run-around concerned the budget of the UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, of which both Serbia and Russia complained Thursday morning in the Council. That day, Inner City Press asked

Inner City Press: There is a letter by Serbia to the Security Council complaining about the budget proposal of the UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), saying that, as proposed by the UN, it wouldn’t allow the Mission to carry out its functions under resolution 1244 (1999), and that Mr. [Lamberto] Zannier has not been signing the laws of the Assembly of Kosovo, as they believe is required. I understand that the Council will talk about it, but what’s UNMIK’s response to this critique of its budget and Mr. Zannier not signing the laws of Kosovo?

Associate Spokesperson: Well, first of all, you could ask UNMIK about its response. But what I know about this is that the Security Council is expected to discuss this under other matters this morning. So I think the thing to do would be to wait until they are done with that particular discussion.

Inner City Press: Just one question. Who makes… who draws up the budget for UNMIK? Is it UNMIK itself or is it the Secretariat here in New York?

Associate Spokesperson: If I were you, I would check with UNMIK about how their budget process is done.

Inner City Press did check with UNMIK, whose spokesman Alexander Ivanko replied on this that “The proposed budget is submitted to UNHQ and it is up to them to provide it to the media.”

And so on April 17, Inner City Press asked asked Haq:

Inner City Press: I just want to ask you again about this, the UNMIK; what was discussed in the Council yesterday under other matters? You said to ask UNMIK so I did about the allegation that the budget doesn’t allow them to comply with resolution 1244 (1999). And among other things, the Spokesman there, Mr. [Alexander] Ivanko has said: “The proposed budget is submitted to UNHQ and it’s up to them to provide it to the media.” So I wanted to know from you whether we can get since it was the big topic of the Council yesterday if we can... He represented that this budget, although it represents a 90 per cent cut, totally complies with 1244; that Russia and Serbia are wrong, et cetera. But can we get a copy of the actual budget? He has referred me back to you, so I am back to you.

Associate Spokesperson Haq: Well, certainly I’ll check whether that’s a public document or not, and we’ll try and get back to you on that.

That sounded fair enough. But when Haq “got back on that,” it was this:

Subject: Your question on UNMIK's budget
From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply
To: Inner City Press
Sent: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:38 pm

For questions related to the budgets of peacekeeping operations, pls contact DPKO's public affairs section.

That is, more run-around referring Inner City Press to yet another part of the Secretariat, for a question twice asked of the UN’s official spokespeople at the noon briefing. What’s that office for?

DPKO did, however, provide at least one answer through the Spokesperson’s Office, on Inner City Press’ April 15 question if the military dictator in Fiji ever serves as a peacekeeper:

Inner City Press: Yesterday, I asked about this in regards to New Zealand, but now, Australia. There is an article in from Australia that the Rudd Government has told the UN to stop not just future, but current use of Fijian peacekeepers. Can you state if, in fact, the UN has formally heard from both New Zealand and Australia, or separately? And also, can you confirm that the current military leader of Fiji was a UN peacekeeper himself?

Associate Spokesperson: Commodore [Frank] Bainimarama, you mean?

Inner City Press: That’s correct. He reportedly served in previous UN missions.

Associate Spokesperson: I am not aware. I’ll check with the Department of Peacekeeping Operations on that. The Secretary-General has spoken to a number of officials on Fiji. In fact, even as he departed Thailand, he met with the Prime Minister of New Zealand, and Fiji was one of the topics that they had discussed. So, he and other people in the Secretariat have discussed the matter. But our position stands that we would review any future contributions of Fiji to UN peacekeeping on a case-by-case basis. All right, have a good afternoon everyone.

[The Associate Spokesperson later said that there was no record of Commodore Bainimarama having served as a United Nations peacekeeper.]

This last, in brackets, is what was inserted into the UN’s transcript. In fact, DPKO via the Spokesperson’s office sent Inner City Press a bit more:

Subject: Your question on Fiji
From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply
To: Inner City Press
Sent: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 3:39 pm

We have not found any record that Commodore Bainimarama had served as a peacekeeper for the United Nations, but he had served in the Multinational Force and Observers in Sinai in 1986/87. The Multinational Force and Observers is an independent (non-UN) peacekeeping mission, created as a result of the 1978 Camp David Accords and the 1979 Treaty of Peace. If we receive more information, we'll convey it to you.

Interestingly , while Bainimarama’s resume does not list the UN, it shows he received military training from, among others, Chile, New Zealand, Australia, Canada Malaysia, and the United States… We will have more on all this.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/ossg1apwk041909.html