Monday, February 28, 2022
Sunday, February 27, 2022
Saturday, February 26, 2022
On Ukraine Sunday UNSC Clown Show Set As Guterres Bans Inner City Press and Brags of Canceled Junket
By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell Book
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - Song
SDNY / UN GATE, Feb 26 – When Russia announced it will recognize independence for the Donetsk and Luhansk "People’s Republics," eyes turned to the United Nations, full of corruption and ineptitude under Antonio Guterres.
Guterres was nowhere to be seen, only recently back from the Genocide Games in Beijing. His spokesman Stephane Dujarric banned Inner City Press from his noon briefing, which he started late cutting off even others by WebEx. In the room, he took three questions in a row from China state media.
After military action began literally during a Security Council meeting, a draft resoluation came out - Inner City Press has published it here and here -- sure to be vetoed, Inner City Press wrote on February 24.
On February 25 it happened. Not only the veto, but abstentions by China (population 1.4 billion and a genocide supported by Guterres), India also with population of 1.4 billion, and the president of the Security Council for March, the UAE.
Afterward Guterres ran to the open mic and, shilling for money, said he has making his crony Amin Awad head of aid in Ukraine, see below.
On Saturday, with the UN dead (First Avenue vlog here), it announced a renewed UN Security Council clown show for Sunday 3 pm, to send the whole circus of hot air and Guterres' corruption on Monday to the UN General Assembly, bought by Chinese state bribers Ng Lap Seng and CEFC China Energy / Ye Jianming under John Ashe and Sam Kutesa. And Abdulla Shahid? He and his spokesperson Paulina Kubiak won't answer Inner City Press' written questions about who pays the UNPGA staff.
And on February 26, Guterres through Stephane Dujarric bragged: "Due to the aggravating situation in Ukraine, the Secretary-General will remain in New York and not travel to Geneva as planned. He will send a video message to Monday’s meeting of the Human Rights Council."
But Friday Feb 25 Dujarric said, "The Secretary-General will be travelling over the weekend. He’ll be going to Geneva where, on Monday morning, he will deliver remarks at the opening of the 49th regular session of the Human Rights Council. We expect him back here on Monday afternoon." If he'd speak Monday, was the junket another one to visit his bank in Lisbon? Asked but not answered. See, song:
Inner City Press, now banned by Guterres, exposed Awad siding with the extremist government of Sri Lanka:
The Staff Union alleges a pattern: "The recent action of Sri Lanka to detain two national staff appears to be a campaign against UN personnel, which is illegal under international law. Authorities have been arresting, without explanation, UN staff members, initially refusing to provide access to them by UN officials." Click here to view the Staff Union statement.
Before issuing their statement, UN Staff Union officials expressed outrage at quotes by the UN's Country Representative in Sri Lanka, UNHCR's Amim Awad, that "the UN acknowledges without reservation the right of the security services of Sri Lanka to investigate any allegations of criminal wrongdoing, including by UN staff members, and will cooperate fully to support due process."
The UN is advertising its obsolescence, like a badge of honor. It is time to move on.
UAE takes over UNSC Presidency March 1. Will they too exclude Inner City Press? Watch this site.
The deep decay of the UN under Guterres came into focus, but its supporters looked away and made excuses. Stand-up here. First Ukraine song here
At the courts, which Inner City Press while banned from the UN by Guterres covers, Ukraine, fending off troops on its borders and separately an arbitral award to Tatneft, cited both in arguments before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 17. Inner City Press live tweeted it (more on Patreon here), thread here:
now Ukraine v. PAO Tatneft, in which Ukraine is opposing discovery requests by citing troops on its border. SDNY judge says, I understand, but... Ukraine's lawyer Maria Kostytska: There is no justification for these 52 subpoenas from Tatneft. There are troops on Ukraine's border.
Judge: I understand that. But I am concerned with efficiencies in these two litigations. Ukraine wants a protective order entered - not (just) to protect it militarily, but hear to keep documents in the case secret, from the Press and public. Inner City Press may after research oppose this - this week we won some unsealing, here
Tatneft's lawyer: Ukraine wants to delay. We have subpoena-ed financial institutions. [From docket, involved: #BankOfAmerica, #WellsFargo, #MorganStanley, #Santander, #CIBC, #CreditAgricole & #GoldmanSachs (which we're covering #EDNY: US v. Ng.
Ukraine: There are discovery proceedings in four Federal courts, in NY and DC. [So what's the 4th?] We are speaking on behalf of the highest levels of Ukraine's government. The Prime Minister is considering this. There is a mediation upcoming.
Ukraine's lawyer: We are not delaying. We are exercising our recourse against an award based on illegal share purchase using promissory notes. We have not waived this due to estoppel. We have not provided on appeal. So we seek certiorari
Tatneft's lawyer: The discovery could be avoided if Ukraine would secure the judgment. The arbitral award is what it is. We are entitled to pursue discovery without further delay. Judge: Maybe Ms. Kostytska tomorrow will have more info from her client [Ukraine]
Judge: So this is how we're going to proceed -- Ukraine's lawyer: We want to add an additional suggestion, we want reconsideration under Local Rule 6.3, your clear error.
Digging into the docket, we find a declaration by Ukraine citing the US State Department on an "invasion force of 175,000."
More on Patreon here.
This case is Ukraine v. PAO Tatneft, 21-mc-376 (Koeltl / Netburn)
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.
Wells Fargo Sued For Redlining After Refused Deposit From Haitian-Born Man in SDNY
By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell Book
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE, Feb 26 – Ernst Valery sued Wells Fargo for discrimination, or "banking while black."
On February 7, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge J. Paul Oetken held a proceeding. Inner City Press covered it.
Valery, born in Haiti, was depositing a check for tax credit project but Wells Fargo refused to take it, instead "barraging him, in front of his wife, with a battery of interrogatives questioning his entitlement to the funds."
The SDNY action was stayed pending a motion in the Ninth Circuit. Now the stay is off, and papers are due in four, then three, then two weeks.
Later in February in the Northern District of California, Wells Fargo was sued for discrimination in lending, in Williams v. Wells Fargo, 22-cv-990 (complaint here)
The SDNY case is Valery v. Wells Fargo & Company et al., 21-cv-5464 (Oetken)
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.
In Jho Low 1MDB Trial Leissner Issue Suspend Trial For Monday Now More Evidence Fights #WeaselOfWallSt
By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon EDNY Vlog
Honduras - The Source - The Root - etc WeaselText
EDNY COURTHOUSE, Feb 25 – In the 1MDB scandal Inner City Press live tweeted a proceeding in August 2020, here and below.
On January 28, 2021 Ng Chong Hwa, a.k.a. “Roger Ng" was applying to be released on a curfew. Inner City Press live tweeted it here.
On January 26, 2021 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie held another proceeding. Inner City Press covered it, and now begins to cover the trial.
On February 15 Inner City Press went to EDNY. No electronics, not in the overflow courtroom. (So standup VLOG in Cadman Plaza afterward here).
On February 22, Inner City Press again went to EDNY, for testimony by cooperator Tim Leissner. While no electronics in the overflow courtroom, it was able to quickly tweet a thread when the trial day ended, here.
On February 23, Inner City Press yet again went to EDNY, for more direct testimony by cooperator Tim Leissner. It was able to quickly tweet a thread when the trial day ended, here.
On February 24, Leissner described his yacht and deal(s) with Russell Simmons. At the end, a discussion of marital privilege and travel ban. Inner City Press ran down, before vlog from outside, to tweet from the Media Room, here and below.
On February 25 there was a short conference which Inner City Press live tweeted here
now in US v. #JhoLow / Ng case, now a conference before EDNY Judge Brodie on discovery problems which will cancel the trial on Monday.
Assistant US Attorney: To review these documents, our privilege team needs to speak to Mr. Leissner's counsel, we'll have to ask for your permission for that. The documents can be viewed over the weekend, even without the vendor
Judge Brodie: I can give you a conference on Monday, or even Sunday. Ng's lawyer: How about Monday morning? Judge Brodie: Ok, 10 am. Adjourned
Afterwards, Ng's counsel submitted a letter: "Dear Chief Judge Brodie: We write in response to the government’s February 20, 2022, letter (Dkt. 147) requesting that the Court preclude Mr. Ng from introducing an exculpatory banker’s notation contained in a June 13, 2012, Capital Place bank record. This notation was made by a banker as part of the transfer application process after speaking with Judy Chan Leissner and her accountant–who both verified that the $17.5 million transfer from Judy Chan Leissner’s Capital Place account at Chiyu Bank to Mr. Ng’s relative’s Silken Waters account related to investment funds. This notation confirms what counsel has been stating for years in its motion to dismiss, motions in limine and opening statement: that the money transferred from the Leissners to Mr. Ng’s family were payments for a previous investment and not criminal proceeds. Continuing their efforts to keep exculpatory information from the jury, the government now moves, after counsel’s opening statement and in the middle of trial, to preclude information that it has had in its possession for years and that it had notified the defense in January 2022 that it would be introducing in its case-in-chief at trial. For the reasons stated below, the government’s untimely motion should be denied." Full letter on Patreon here.
From Feb 24: Cooperator Leissner STILL on direct and there'll be a break before cross.
Leissner said from his ill-gotten gains he bought a $50 million yacht, and passed on to Ng, in total, $35 million. So why does Leissner have the cooperation deal? Leissner says he has an investment vehicle with Russell Simmons, called New Horizons. Also used dirty money to invest in Inter Milan soccer team and Celcius Holdings energy drink company.
Leissner says after Jho Low kept getting denied by banks on KYC, Jho wanted to start his own bank and Leissner was willing to help. Jho was concerned that "the Federal Reserve Bank" was looking into him, Leissner testifies.
Leissner describes moving $80 million - in Euros - to Bahamas then into a US shell company named "Key Way Pride" (?)
Leissner with his ill-gotten gains bought a girl friend an apartment in London, and himself an apartment on 68th St and Madison Avenue in NYC
Goldman Sachs cooperator Tim Leissner investment money he stole from the people of Malaysia in... All Def Digital alldefdigital.com
Leissner said he tried to get Jho Low into Banque Havilland, since he (Leissner) knew the chairman
Update 3:44 pm - OK *now* the trial day is over. After Judge Brodie let the jury go, she inquired into discovery and Malaysia travel ban (lifted?). There are marital privileged documents US will give to Ng's lawyers to see if they want to use them, then litigate
On that, there's be a telephone conference tomorrow which Inner City Press should be able to better live tweet (perhaps alongside a UN Security Council meeting on Ukraine with a near-certain veto).
Then a Feb 24 EDNY vlog here;
a Feb 23 EDNY standup here.
Before, a Feb 22 EDNY stand-up, here.
And see, TheWeaselofWallStreet, new Jho Low Blues here
On February 18 the US filed a redacted letter to Judge Brodie, that "The government respectfully submits this letter to notify the Court of the status of the government’s efforts to determine whether the defendant’s wife, is subject to a travel ban and, if so, how this ban may be lifted for purposes of having her testify at this trial. As brief background, on January 26, 2022, the defendant filed a motion in limine requesting that defense witnesses and (the defendant’s brother-in-law) be allowed to testify remotely via CCTV. ECF No. 122 (“Ng Br.”). In support of his argument that was unavailable to testify in person, the defendant argued that Malaysia had prohibited her from traveling to the United States. Ng Br. at 4-5. The government opposed the defendant’s motion, arguing that any purported unavailability of may be obviated." Full letter on Patreon here.
On February 19, Ng's lawyers replied: "Dear Chief Judge Brodie: We write to correct aspects of the government’s letter filed yesterday concerning the ongoing efforts to secure the live trial testimony of (Dkt. 145.) As an initial matter, the government misunderstands the process of lifting the travel ban. The defense team has been told in the clearest terms that the only way that Malaysia will lift the travel ban is if the United States government makes such a request. Indeed, on February 3, 2022, the United States government represented to the Court and counsel that it was making such a request, a fact that corroborated the information told to counsel. On a phone call on February 18, 2022, the government for the first time said that the onus to lift the travel ban is on the person banned, which is, we believe, incorrect and inconsistent with the information provided to us and to the Court. Nonetheless, we will be making a formal request to the Malaysian Attorney General’s chamber when that office opens on Monday morning (Malaysia time) to lift the travel ban for However, without the meaningful input of the government, we are assured that any request by alone will be unsuccessful. Therefore, we also set forth additional details relevant to the travel ban and related issues that both the government and the Court should know. This will permit the government to be more effective hopefully in prompting the Malaysian government to lift the travel ban and in securing testimony at this trial. In assisting the defense in lifting the travel ban, the government should know that the ban has been put into place by two different law enforcement entities in Malaysia, each of which would have to agree to lift the ban for it to effectively be removed. First, the Commercial Crimes Investigation Department (CCID) must agree to lift the ban. Second, the Malaysian AntiCorruption Commission (MACC) must also agree to lift the ban. Securing the agreement of one agency without the other will cause the ban to remain, we are told. Therefore, any efforts at lifting the ban must be directed at both the CCID and the MACC."
On February 15 on the stand Strategic Marketing Group's Cummings about money paid out to party with Jho Lo and and in at least one case Roger Ng. $150,000 to Leonardo DiCaprio, money to P. Diddy, Kim Kardashian, Jamie Foxx.
Ng's lawyer, on cross, asking about a notation for wrangling models, and "models" in quotes.
On February 16, Tim Leissner testified on direct that "the bribes and kickbacks made the transactions possible" and "instantaneously make us heroes" at Goldman.
Now, delay: the trial is not sitting on February 17 because of a juror’s prior commitment - and will resume on Tuesday morning with Leissner still on direct.
Inner City Press is taking the steps it can to cover this and other EDNY cases more closely. Watch this site.
On January 26 it emerged that if any juror is unvaccinated, no member of the public - or press? - will be allowed in the courtroom. Is this, then, a public trial? There were also arguments about an account run by Ng's wife, and a statement that there are no jury trials in Malaysia. But is the US, or EDNY, moving to trials with no public or press in the courtroom?
It seems so. On February 10 Chief Judge Brodie confirmed no public or press in the courtroom - but did not address why no call-in line, despite saying everything possible is being done to provide access. From the order, quoting what Judge Donnelly did in the R.Kelly case:
"as Judge Ann Donnelly noted in Kelly, “even a seat in the courtroom does not guarantee that there never will be a technical problem, or that observers will have unobstructed views of every participant in the trial.” Memorandum at 2, Kelly, No. 19-CR-286; see also United States v. Barrow, No. 20-CV-127, 2021 WL 3602859, at *11 (D.D.C. Aug. 13, 2021) (rejecting the defendant’s argument that his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial was violated because members of the public viewed the proceedings from an overflow courtroom and stating that, “[a]s a practical matter, a spectator viewing a trial from the courtroom gallery would not have a perfect sight line of each angle of the courtroom — let alone each individual juror”); United States v. Babichenko, 508 F. Supp. 3d 774, 779–80 (D. Idaho 2020) (noting that a “video feed of the proceedings will give the public a much better view of the witness testimony, exhibits, and examination, than they would have at a satellite [in-person] location”). “To the extent that this measure is a partial limit on public access, it is warranted by the [Court’s] ‘overriding interest’ in ensuring public safety during a global health pandemic.” Memorandum at 2, Kelly, No. 19-CR-286 (quoting Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal., 464 U.S. 501, 510 (1984)); see also Press-Enter. Co., 464 U.S. at 510 (“The presumption of openness may be overcome only by an overriding interest based on findings that closure is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.”); United States v. Bledson, No. 20-CR-99, 2021 WL 1152431, at *3 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 25, 2021) (“In light of the pressing health and safety concerns posed by an open trial [during COVID-19], the [c]ourt finds that it has advanced an overriding interest.”)... There is no reasonable alternative to the protocols adopted by the Court.” Memorandum at 3, Kelly, No. 19-CR-286." We disagree - a call in line is possible, and necessary.
Watch this site - Inner City Press is increasingly covering the EDNY, see here and here and more.
On January 7, Judge Brodie agreed that Ng should get back $750,000 of his $1 million bond, to pay his lawyers. This was over the objection of the prosecutors, who said Malaysia only agreed to release Ng in light of the $1 million bond.
Talk turned to COVID and Omicron. Ng's lawyer acknoweldge that the variants has reached the defense, "maybe even me." Still he agreed to the new delayed trial date of February 7. Watch this site.
AUSA: We are concerned that Mr. Ng would or could flee, if no longer confined to him home.
Judge Margo K. Brodie: Would he flee back to Malaysia from which he consented to extradition?
AUSA: As we approach trial, as he sees the 3500 evidence, it is a concern.... We conferred with our office of International Affairs and this is where we ended up.
Pre-Trial Services Ms. Carter: We don't object to a curfew, but location monitoring should continue.
Ng's defense lawyer: We don't believe your Honor is bound by, or party to, the treaty.
Judge Brodie: I will go with Pre-Trial and allow a curfew. The 2d Circuit's recent decision in Schwartz said the court delegated too much to Probation. So I'll set hours.
Ng's lawyer: Curfew from 8 pm to 8 am?
Judge Brodie: OK. Subject to Pre-Trial. Let's get together in a month, or really, mid-March since the administration order runs through March 1. March 18 at 10 am. Adjourned.
Jump cut to December 21, 2021 - Ng's counsel says he wants the grand jury materials about Malysian money laundering. He is also pushing back against having to preview for the government how he will do cross-examination with materials the government already has.
Inner City Press will stay on this case.
From October 22, "today, in federal court in Brooklyn, Goldman Sachs entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York and the Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, Fraud Section and Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Sections (the Department) in connection with a criminal information filed in the Eastern District of New York charging the Company with conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA. GS Malaysia pleaded guilty in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York to a one-count criminal information charging it with conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA. Previously, Tim Leissner, the former Southeast Asia Chairman and a Participating Managing Director of Goldman Sachs, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Ng Chong Hwa, also known as “Roger Ng,” former Managing Director of Goldman and Head of Investment Banking for GS Malaysia, has been charged with conspiracy to violate the FCPA and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Ng was extradited from Malaysia to face these charges and is scheduled for trial in March 2021. All four cases are assigned to U.S. District Judge Margo K. Brodie of the Eastern District of New York."
For those counting, HSBC also got a deferred prosecution agreement. And the Federal Reserve, in the shadows, has let Goldman Sachs into bank, and rubber stamps mergers like by Banco Bradesco to this day. From August 2020:
OK - in EDNY, 1MDB / Malaysia defendant EDNY Ng Chong Hwa, a.k.a. “Roger Ng" charged with conspiring to launder billions of dollars embezzled from 1Malaysia Development is before Judge Margo K. Brodie. Inner City Press will live tweet - thread
Judge Brodie says there is a back-up of cases caused by COVID19, no assurance this trial can go forward in January 2021. Says won't have real info in September - even if protocol is in place, it will still be being tested. AUSA points out extradition from Malaysia
AUSA says a status conference in early October would be fine "even if the trial is moved a little bit." Defense lawyer: I understand the difficulties of the court. But I'd like to convince the government or your Honor to loosen Mr Ng's conditions of home detention
Defense lawyer: Malaysia is not allowing Americans into the country at all, at least until September. This is a challenge we face. We'd like Mr. Ng to get out a bit more, and exercise. Judge: I think the parties should work that out.
The case is US v. Jho, et al., 18-cr-538 (Brodie)
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.