Saturday, July 29, 2023

For SDNY Trial of Hwang For Archegos $34B Meltdown He Seeks Subpoena of Goldman MS


By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, July 27 –  In the wake of the Archegos meltdown, the other shoe dropped on April 27, when the US Attorney for the SDNY unsealed and indictment charging Bill Hwang Patrick Halligan, Archegos’s CFO with racketeering conspiracy, securities fraud, and wire fraud offenses.   

 Inner City Press went to the SDNY press conference to ask, What about Credit Suisse and Nomura and people in those banks? What about the massive family office loophope to the Investment Advisors Act of 1940? This has come up in the OneCoin fraud case, on which the Office used perjured testimony and now agrees to delay after delay.

 Damian William referred obliquely to Hwang doing it in the dark, but otherwise the issue - which is addressed by a pending bill in Congress - did not come up. Nor did Lisa Monaco, present in New York for the presser, address it.

On June 1, newly assigned District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein held a conference in the case. Inner City Press attended and live tweet it here (and asked defense counsel a question later, here). Thread here.

Hwang's lawyer Larry Lustberg predicts robust motions. Hwang's co-defendant Halligan's lawyer says this is like the NBA, sharp elbows. Predicts omnibus motions on/against RICO allegations.

Judge Hellerstein: How about ten weeks from today, you chart your motions, consolidated as much as possible. Aug 9 at 11.

Lustberg: No problem, judge.

 Judge Hellerstein: Maybe we need a list and definition of each alleged misrepresentation.

 AUSA: We expect them to request a bill of particulars.

Judge: Do it before the next conference, and put it on ECF. Maybe on Aug 9, I'll set the trial date. Mr Lustberg, when can you list what you're lacking?

Lustberg: Soon.

Judge: Time excluded until Aug 9. Adjourned.

And after, stand-up here, short Q&A here.

Jump cut to June 15, 2023, when the US - ostensibly for the defense, and trading off another case Inner City Press is covering, about fake passport(s), wrote: " The Government writes regarding the trial schedules in United States v. Hwang, 22 Cr. 240 (AKH), and United States v. Etoty, 20 Cr. 187 (AKH). On May 10, 2023, new counsel for defendant Sung Kook (Bill) Hwang entered appearances in Case Number 22 Cr. 240 (AKH). Hwang’s new counsel also contacted the Government, seeking consent for a trial adjournment, in part to accommodate certain personal scheduling conflicts. While the Government is prepared to proceed with the originally scheduled trial date, in light of discussions with Hwang’s new counsel, the Government writes on behalf of all parties to respectfully request that the beginning of trial in United States v. Hwang be adjourned to February 20, 2024. Trial in United States v. Etoty, 20 Cr. 187 (AKH), is currently scheduled to begin February 21, 2024. However, both to permit additional time to prepare for that trial and to accommodate the length of trial in United States v. Hwang, which the parties currently expect to last approximately two months" - full letter on Patreon here.

Back on July 14, Judge Hellerstein approved Hwang's request to be allowed, on three days' notice to the Office of Pretrial Services, to travel throughout the 48 states to "support the poor and oppressed" via Grace & Mercy Foundation.

On July 20 the US Attorney's Office asked to postpone the conference set for August 9 until September 8, saying it has been unable to complete the production of discovery.

And on September 8, with COVID masks voluntary in most of SDNY but in place in this courtroom, this: "Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein: Pretrial Conference as to Sung Kook (Bill) Hwang, Patrick Halligan held on 9/8/2022. Deft. Sung Kook Hwang pres. w/attys. Lawrence Lustberg, Thomas Valen and Jeffrey Nagel; Deft. Patrick Halligan pres. w/attys. Mary Mulligan and Tim Haggerty; Motions to be filed by 12/2/22; response by 1/12/23; reply 1/27/23; Trial set for 10/10/23; FPTC set for 10/4/23 at 10:00 a.m; Time is excluded until 10/10/23; in the interest of justice."

Jump cut to January 27, 2023, when Lustberg submitted another filing asserting prosecutorial misconduct, specifically misrepresentations that Hwang was a subject, not a target, of its investigation, and that the US was open minded about whether or not to charge Hwang. This could often be said or alleged.

On February 7, Judge Hellerstein citing time conflicts on the part of counsel pushed the trial into 2024: "SCHEDULING ORDER as to Sung Kook (Bill) Hwang, Patrick Halligan. A conflict with another trial having arisen on the part of counsel, trial in the above-captioned criminal matter is adjourned from October 10, 2023 to January 9, 2024."

On June 20, it was pushed back again: "SCHEDULING ORDER as to Sung Kook (Bill) Hwang, Patrick Halligan. Trial in the above-captioned criminal matter, by request of all parties, is adjourned from January 9, 2024 to February 20, 2024 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 14D. The Final Pretrial Conference will be held on February 14, 2024 at 2:30 p.m. Time is excluded in the interest of justice from January 9, 2024 to February 20, 2024 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 6/20/2023)."

On July 27, Hwang wrote in seeking approval of subpoenas to Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Bank of Montreal, Credit Suisse, UBS, Nomura, MUFG, Mizuho, Macquarie, Jeffries and Deutsche Bank, to show he did not "use his lawfully executed swaps to artificially impact the prices of the underlying stocks." Watch this site.

Back on March 21, 2023 Judge Hellerstein held an hour and a half proceeding in which he denied more than a dozen motions by Team Hwang. Inner City Press was there are live tweeted, thread here:

OK- now Bill Hwang of Archegos arguing for dismissal of criminal fraud case against him.

Hwang's lawyer Lustberg: There was no spoofing here. There were no false statements. AUSA Podolsky cites a 2008 decision by Judge Rakoff sitting by designation on the 2d Circuit, on 10(b)(5).

Judge Hellerstein: I find that fraud is sufficiently alleged.

Halligan's lawyer cites a Judge Patterson decision on RICO Section 1961(1)(b). Judge: After biological weapons?

AUSA: 6 lines below that. And the PSLRA amendments took this right from civil litigants...Mr Hwang wanted to control the market. It was pump and brag

 Judge Hellerstein: My ruling is that the indictment is legally sufficient. Defense sputtering about Count 10, citing 2d Circuit Charles Schwab case

Judge Hellerstein: Motion denied. I'll issue a short summary order- until then I reserve the right to change my mind

 After that, a motion for a hearing on alleged prosecutorial misconduct was argued - Lustberg said the AUSAs never said when Hwang became a target, not subject, but continued to elicit information right until the indictment, and even after (it was sealed). Denied. Final pre-trial conference is set for January 5, 2024.

  On April 7, Halligan's lawyer wrote in contesting the Court's Order that the indictment alleges that Archegos traded in derivative securities "without satisfying disclosure requirement." The argument is that there was no requirement, that Archegos' equity positions did not exceed 5% of any issuer and its swap trading was not subject to any requirement. The prosecution declined to join the application - in fact, on April 12 the US Attorney's Office wrote in that "The Motion Order's brief summary fairly captures one aspect of the alleged scheme.. to the extent the Halligan Letter might be read as seeking some unspecified relief, it should be denied."

More including on Halligan on Substack here. Watch this site.

The SDNY press release: SUNG KOOK (BILL) HWANG  The defendant will be released today upon his own signature to $100 million personal recognizance bond, to be secured by $5 million in cash and 2 properties, and co-signed by two financially responsible individuals, including his wife. The defendant agrees to attest that he lost his passport and his wife will surrender her passport. Travel will be restricted to the SDNY, EDNY, District of Connecticut, and District of New Jersey. Mr. Hwang will be released today on his signature, with remaining conditions to be met by May 6.    

  Late on May 5, Hwang lawyer - who, full disclosure, Inner City Press knows - wrote in to seek to modify the condition about "the posting of two properties what would be forfeited should he violation the conditions of his release (one of which would be his primary residence at 26 Trafalgar Road, Tenafly NJ)." Other, different documents were submitted.

On March 18, the assigned District Judge Andrew L. Carter convened a conference in his courtroom in 40 Foley Square. Inner City Press went - but it was quickly over. Judge Carter recused himself, as Inner City Press first tweeted:

Now Judge Andrew L. Carter in US v. Hwang / Archegos case is recusing himself due to stock in, and wife worked for,  JPMorgan  Chase , involved enough in the charged fraud [song]

 Hwang's lawyer Lawrence Lustberg, who Inner City Press knows (Press will not recuse) argues but Judge Carter says, Not to me.  Adjourned.

  Afterward Inner City Press gave its business card to Lustberg by the elevators, then took the stairs. Reemerging on the 9th floor to check for cases, Team Hwang had gotten off there. Strategizing...

On May 23, Hwang's case was reassigned to Judge Alkin K. Hellerstein: "NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT as to Sung Kook (Bill) Hwang, Patrick Halligan, to Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. no longer assigned to the case."

On May 25, the first proceeding before Judge Hellerstein was set, for June 1 at 10 am: "MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Sung Kook (Bill) Hwang on [26] LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein from Alex Rossmiller dated May 24, 2022 re: conference scheduling and exclusion of time. ENDORSEMENT: The conference is set for June 1, 2022 at 10:00 a.m., and time is excluded until then, in the interest of justice. SO ORDERED."

Watch this site.

Co-defendant PATRICK HALLIGAN  The defendant will be released today upon (i) $1,000,000 personal recognizance bond; (ii) co-signed by two financially responsible persons, one of them being his wife; (iii) travel restricted to EDNY and SDNY; (iv) regular pre-trial supervision; and (v) surrender of passport (which has occurred).

  Meanwhile later  - after re-up of book and talk to NYU Journalism School, here and here - in the SDNY Magistrate a defendant was detained until trial, charged as a felon in possession. We'll have more, much more, on this.

The case is US v. Hwang, 22-cr-240 (Hellerstein)

***

@SDNYLIVE courthouse #CourtCastCast
                              200 Worth Street
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

After Carroll v Trump Verdict in 1st Case Now DA Bragg Asks For Video of Deposition


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, July 27 – During the "Carroll II" trial of E. Jean Carroll versus Donald Trump, both sides put in exhibits, but no defense exhibits were made available to the public or press, see Inner City Press filing and below. 

On May 11, Trump filed a notice of appeal to the 2d Circuit "from [178] Judgment,,. Document filed by Donald J. Trump. Filing fee $ 505.00, receipt number ANYSDC-27729258. Form C and Form D are due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit."

On July 26, docketed July 27, the office of Manhattan DA Bragg wrote to Judge Kaplan seeking his approval for E. Jean Carroll's lawyers to given them the video of their deposition of Donald Trump on October 19, 2022 - which Inner City Press already published in full on YouTube here
 
 This would be for use in the criminal "hush money" case recently remanded to state court by SDNY Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein. Watch this site.

On May 22, Carroll's lawyer filed a proposed schedule for the earlier, Carroll I case, with briefing through July 31. Letter on Patreon here.

  In Trump's amended answer, in late June a counterclaim targeted at Carroll's post verdict comments on CNN: "on May 10, 2023, Counterclaim Defendant appeared on CNN for a television interview (the “Interview”), following the jury verdict on May 9, 2023, in the case of E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump, Civil Action No. 22-cv-100165  (“Carroll II”). 4. During the Interview, Counterclaim Defendant was specifically asked about the jury unanimously finding Counterclaimant not liable for rape in Carroll II. 5. In response to that specific inquiry, Counterclaim Defendant disregarded the jury’s finding that Counterclaimant did not rape her, and replied: 'oh yes he did, oh yes he did.'"

On June 29, Judge Kaplan denied summary judgment.

On July 26, "LETTER addressed to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan from Roberta A. Kaplan dated 7/25/2023 re: We write on behalf of Plaintiff E. Jean Carroll with respect to Your Honor's July 19, 2023 Order directing each party to "file a motion setting forth precisely each fact or proposition of law, if any, as to which the moving party claims Carroll II has preclusive effective in this action." ECF 178. We understand this Order as directing the parties to submit any targeted summary judgment motions they may wish to make in Carroll I raising preclusion arguments based on Carroll II." Then Carroll's counsel's letter said the second trial should only be about narrow issues of damage. Letter on Patreon here

 Watch this site.

On May 24, Judge Kaplan set a schedule: "ORDER, 1.Any response to plaintiff's letter of May 22, 2023 shall be filed on or before May 26, 2023."

On May 26, Trump's lawyer Alina Habba wrote that "Plainly stated, the jury in Carroll II found that the alleged rape did not occur. However, the entire Complaint in Carroll I contains allegations of purported defamatory statements arising from this precise allegation – not a purported sexual assault." Full letter on Patreon here.

On June 5, Habba filed a memo opposing the request to amend, arguing, "Plaintiff’s Amended Allegations Unduly Prejudice Defendant II. Plaintiff’s Motion Should Be Denied Because of Plaintiff’s Undue Delay III. Plaintiff’s Motion Should Be Denied Due to Futility  IV. This Court Should Permit Defendant to File a Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment in Light of the Carroll II Verdict. " Full memo on Patreon here.

On June 9, after DOJ asked for more time, Carroll's lawyer wrote, "DOJ’s letter makes clear that the United States no longer stands by its original Westfall Act certification of Defendant Donald J. Trump. As DOJ explains, that decision rests not only on the recent filing of a proposed amended complaint, but also on other intervening legal and factual developments, including the ruling of the D.C. Court of Appeals, Trump’s deposition, and the Carroll II jury verdict.. there is simply no merit to DOJ’s claim that it cannot even commence its Westfall Act analysis until this Court rules on the motion to amend." Full letter on Patreon here.

On June 12, Carroll's counsel filed a reply to amend the complaint, saying that Trump is dreaming up a multiverse. Full filing on Patreon here.

On June 13, Judge Kaplan granted Carroll's motion to amend.

On June 15, Judge Kaplan set the trial date: ORDER, Unless this case previously has been entirely disposed of, trial of this action shall commence on January 15, 2024 absent contrary order of the Court. ( Jury Trial set for 1/15/2024 at 09:30 AM before Judge Lewis A. Kaplan.) (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 6/15/2023).

On June 8, Tacopina filed a motion in Carroll II, for a new trial, arguing against double recovery and that Carroll, if anything, has increased her income after the statements. Full 25 memo on Patreon here.

On June 22, Carroll's counsel opposed any new trial, including a transcript from the NYS MeToo case of Breest v. Haggis, which Inner City Press also covered, here.

More on Substack here

On June 23, Trump's lawyer Tacopina said he'll put up over $5 million - to the court: "We write to respectfully request that the Court so order the enclosed Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding the Use of a Cash Deposit in Court as Security in Lieu of a Supersedeas Bond. The cash deposit will be in the amount of$5,550,000, which is 111% of the judgment amount and is consistent with the traditional security percentage of supersedeas bonds. Additionally, my office is currently holding $5,550,000 in trust" - full letter on Patreon here

 Back on May 9, after less than three hours of deliberation, the jury awarded E. Jean Carroll $5 million damages. Inner City Press live tweeted it, thread here

  Hours later, Inner City Press published the first book about the trial, "Trump Trial I: Press Access Hollywood in the SDNY Court," by Matthew Russell Lee, e-book here, paperback soon here

Trump Trial 1
                        cover

  On May 4, Inner City Press filed a written request to Judge Louis A. Kaplan, copied to each party, requesting that the exhibit be released, and several motions be unsealed. 

  On Friday May 5, Carroll's counsel made some but not all exhibits available to the press on DropBox, including portions of her deposition of Donald Trump.

Inner City Press published that on YouTube, it was reported for example here.

   On Sunday, May 7 before 5 pm, Inner City Press filed this

Carroll I is Carroll v. Trump, 20-cv-7311 (Kaplan)

More on Substack here.

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Bankman-Fried Asks to Seal All Documents He Gave NYT So Inner City Press Files Opposition


By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, July 27 – Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX was indicted in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, leading to his arrest in the Bahamas on December 12, 2022 and extradition to the US on December 21.

On July 26, the SDNY prosecutors informed Judge Lewis A. Kaplan they are dropping the campaign finance charges against SBF, at the request of the Bahamas.

On July 27, SBF's lawyers cursorily asked Judge Kaplan for "leave to file under seal" documents SBF already gave to the New York Times. See letter here.

 Inner City Press immediately filed opposition to sealing in full. Filed letter on DocumentCloud here. It previously successfully opposed SBF's bid to seal his co-signers. Watch this site.

Back on July 13, SBF's lawyers sent Judge Kaplan a sealed list of people, not stating even the number of people, for whom the security guard requirement - to show not sharing phones with SBF - should to waived. They argue, as they did with the co-signers, that the list should be sealed. And they say the SDNY prosecutors agree.... Letter on Patreon here

Early on July 14, Inner City Press filed to unseal the list, filing on CourtListener here.

The case is US v. Bankman-Fried, et al., 22-cr-673 (Kaplan)

More with analysis on Substack here

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

NYC Youth Jail Employee Indicted for Assaulting Teen Gets Mexico Vacation on Bail


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, July 27 – An assault on an inmate in NYC's detention center for juveniles in The Bronx resulted in the indictment of two employees there.

 Both were offered bail on July 26; one however wanted to leave the next morning on a vacation to Mexico. The request was granted but the prosecutors said they would appeal. Inner City Press was there for the arraignment and will continue to report on the case. 

 The prosecutors began the day announcing charges against DAQUAN SEYMOUR and RASHAWN WALKER, two supervisors at the Horizon Juvenile Center (“Horizon”), a secure detention center for juveniles located in the Bronx, New York.  The charges relate to the April 25, 2022, beating of a 16-year-old resident at Horizon and attempt to cover-up the beating.  SEYMOUR and WALKER were charged with federal civil rights offenses, including conspiring to deprive the Minor Victim of his constitutional rights and depriving the Minor Victim of his constitutional rights under color of law, as well as filing false reports.  SEYMOUR and WALKER were arrested this morning and will be presented in Manhattan federal court later today.  The case has been assigned to U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Edgardo Ramos. 

The appeal, from Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo's decision based on Seymour's children remaining in the US, was to be directed to Judge Ramos or to the Part 1 judge. As of 10:30 pm there was nothing in the docket.

On July 27 Inner City Press asked and was told that the vacation to Mexico was allowed and has begun. From the docket: "BAIL DISPOSITION: Deft released on own recognizance; $100,000 Personal recognizance bond; To be cosigned by two financially responsible persons; Travel restricted to SDNY/EDNY and Mexico for the preplanned trip from July 27-July 31 - surrender passport to attorney on 8/1/23."

  The case is US v. Seymour, et al., 23-cr-373 (Ramos / Figueredo) 

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Charged With Helping Deripaska Sanctions Bust Olga Shriki Pled Not Guilty Now Wants Travel


By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell book
BBC - Honduras - CIA Trial book - NY Mag

SDNY COURTHOUSE, July 27 – Oleg Deripaska and three others were indicted on September 28, 2022, for violating the US OFAC sanctions imposed on him April 6, 2018 with regard to Russia's actions in Ukraine.

 On September 29, co-defendant Olga Shriki, charged with selling a music studio and other sanctions-busting for Deripaska, was arrested.

 On November 15, 2022, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge P. Kevin Castel held an in-person arraignment. Inner City Press went and covered it, with only three other people in the courtroom gallery.   

Shriki pleaded not guilty. Her lawyer J. Bruce Maffeo of Cozen O'Connor agreed to six months to obtain and review discovery.

The next conference, as which he will be expected to describe any defense motions, was set seven months out for June 15, 2022 - then it was pushed back to October 12, 2023, at 11 am.

On July 27, Olga Shriki through counsel asked for permission to travel through August to Massachusetts, North Carolina and Virginia, cc-ing the two AUSAs and NJ pre-trial services

The case is US v. Deripaska, et al., 22-cr-518 (Castel)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com