| Man Detained by ICE Filed
SDNY Habeas Then Dropped It &
Filed DNJ Judge Asks of Shopping
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack SDNY
COURTHOUSE,
April 29 âA man from Mexico
now in ICE detention in 26
Federal Plaza filed a habeas
corpus petition in the U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York,
where Inner City Press found
it. The
petition says he was arrested
by after a traffic stop by ICE
while driving his two youngest
children home. After his
detention, his partially
paralyzed wife could not
drive, so a cousin came to
drive the car - and children -
home. The case
was assigned to SDNY Judge
John P. Cronan. The
petition
attached
a printout,
currently in
"NYC HOLD
ROOM." Later
on April 21, the
petitioner voluntarily
dismissed
the petition -
as Inner City
Press has
noted in other
cases. In this
case, Judge
Cronan is digging
into it, convening the
parties "in
particular"
petititioner's
counsel, on
April 29 to
discuss the reasons
for the dismissal
- and refiling
of another
case, in DNJ,
2:26-cv-4241.
On PACER this
says, "You
do not have
permission to
view this
document." Inner
City Press went on
April
29. A
supervisor,
not the lawyer
on the papers,
said he had
seen after
filing that
the client was
now at Delaney
Hall in
New Jersey. Judge Cronan
asked if, had
the SDNY
petition been
assigned to a
judge
more willing
to stay
transfers and
order release,
it would have
been
withdrawn. The
question
stands - in another
case covered
by Inner City
Press, a
habeas corpus
petition
assigned to
Judge Cronan
was dropped and
refiled - in
SDNY. April 22 â A
man from Mexico was detained by ICE on April
21 and on April 22 at 12:14 pm a Walker
Street-based lawyer filed a habeas corpus
petition in his name in the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of New York, where
Inner City Press found it. It was Estrada
Santos v. Genalo, et al., 1:26-cv-3313. At 12:35 pm
the Walker Street-based lawyer filed a
"Notice of Voluntary Dismissal," withdrawing
the petition. At 12:39 pm
- four minutes later - the same lawyer filed
a second habeas corpus petition for the same
client. This case was
Estrada
Santos v. Genalo, et al., 1:26-cv-3316
(Unassigned) --
Until, after
Inner City
Press
published the
above, the
case was
deemed related
and assigned
to Judge
Cronan, who
has asked for a letter
by May 4 why
sanctions
should not
issue (as, he
noted,
is being
consider in an
11th Circuit
case from
Alabama).
Here,
Judge Cronan
asked why NJ
District
Judge Farbiaz
(whose lack
of call-in
line Inner
City Press previously
covered) was
not told an
identical case
had already
been filed.
That question
also stands.
We'll have
more on this - but
not on the NJ /
Farbiaz case,
since it
cannot
be tracked
online. The case is - or
was? - Popoca Solis v.
Francis, et al., 1:26-cv-3258
(Cronan)
*** Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013 Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis. Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com |
Investigative reporting from the inner city to Wall Street to the United Nations This is the blogspot version InnerCityPress.com