Saturday, August 6, 2022

Michael Cohen Lawsuit For Remand to Otisville Fends off Trump Argument to Dismiss in SDNY

 

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell Book
BBC Honduras - CIA Trial Book - NY Mag

SDNY COURTHOUSE, August 2 – Former President Donald Trump, through his lawyer Alina Habba, and Federal defendants argued on August 2 to dismiss Michael Cohen's Federal Tort Claims Act and Bivens complaints.

Inner City Press was there and live tweeted it, here:

Defense: Cohen was in custody pursuant to statute. He claims home confinement is different.

Judge Liman: He's citing the Bail Reform Act. What about abuse of process?

Defense: There was no abuse. BOP sent him to FCI Otisville.

 Judge: He's saying Mr Trump retaliated Defense: On emotional distress, Cohen is not even claiming intent or negligence. Under the FTCA, his complaint should be dismissed.

Judge Liman: He says the prison was 100 degrees. Defense: It's within BOP's discretion. Judge: That's not Judge Laval's analysis

Judge Liman: What if it was 120 or 130 degrees? Defense: The CFR gives discretion. It involves judgment. Judge: I'm trying to figure how your logic wouldn't knock out all FTCA cases. Are prisoners the only ones not protected? Inner City Press @innercitypress · 1h 2d defense lawyer: There is no Bivens relief for alleged 1st Amendment violations.

 Judge Liman: He's alleging that the then-President squashed opposition. We folks in black robes need to review that. Defense: There are alternate remedial structures. This is for damages.

 Defense: He could have filed a grievance with BOP.

Judge Liman: Mr Cohen is saying he spent 16 days in solitary confinement for his political speech. We're talking about the President of the US. Defense: You are bound by the Supreme Court. Judge: I get it.

 Trump's lawyer Alina Habba: This is barrred by Presidential immunity.

Judge Liman: Could a US President just kidnap someone, via a valet, like in other countries?

Habba: No. We have press in the room: we deny these claims. Judge: You've spoken to the press. Speak to me.

Habba: Mr Cohen committed crimes.

Judge Liman: So he can do this to any prisoner?

Habba: These are just hypotheticals. Judge: They tease out rules and the limits of arguments.

Habba: Presidents bomb people. They can't be worrying about being sued. My client has absolute immunity. Thank you. Judge Liman: Does the defense want to address the Coulhurst case? Defense: That's about lazy action.

Cohen's lawyer Andrew Laufer: Judge Hellerstein found the remand was retaliatory, abuse.

Judge Liman: So would a warden cracking down on critics. But no Bivens action is allowed. How would I limit this? Laufer: On home confinement my client could have a cocktail.

[Ironically, amid Michael Cohen's argument about arrest by US Marshals, two US Marshals enter courtroom, whisper to deputy. No, they are not here to remand Cohen. They leave... ]

 Cohen's lawyer Laufer: These were Gulag-like conditions at Otisville.

 Judge Liman: Mr Laufer,I think your client passed you a note. [But apparently not]

Defense rebuttal: He was on furlough, not home confinement. Habba: Donald Trump was not in  Hellerstein's decision.

 Laufer: It was home confinement, with conditions. Judge: Under advisement. Adjourned.

The case is Cohen v. United States of America, et al., 21-cv-10774 (Liman). 

***

@SDNYLIVE courthouse #CourtCastCast
                              200 Worth Street
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.