Saturday, August 14, 2021

IBM Arbitration Cases Raise Piggybacking Rule As 20 Collected Not Consolidated in SDNY

 

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - ESPN

SDNY COURTHOUSE, August 12 –  At least thirty cases have been filed against IBM for age discrimination, raising questions of arbitration and the so-called "piggybacking" rule.  

     On August 11, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Jesse M. Furman held a proceeding. Inner City Press covered it. 

 Judge Furman has not consolidated that cases, but has had some twenty of them transferred to him. IBM opposes formal consolidation, claiming that the employees agreed to not engage in class actions or administrative equivalents.

So Judge Furman has canceled the conferences in the other cases, and expressed an openness to proceeding as In Re IBM Arbitration Cases.

 For now, the lead case is Chastka v. International Business Machines Corp., 21-cv-6296 (Furman). 

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.